Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 85 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 85 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 84 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 33 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 84 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 85 |
| Dry | 83 | 85 |
| Wet | 82 | 85 |
| Snow | 77 | 90 |
| Comfort | 70 | 84 |
| Noise | 36 | – |
| Treadwear | 78 | 84 |
| Handling | 76 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering drivers significant confidence in adverse weather. While it receives high praise for its traction and handling, user experiences are polarized regarding its longevity, noise levels, and performance on wet or dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
- Reliable braking performance in severe weather
- Satisfactory comfort levels for a dedicated winter tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- High noise levels on dry asphalt
- Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance on certain vehicle types
Observations
- High-torque or high-performance vehicles (e.g., DB11, tuned GTI) may experience increased traction control intervention or accelerated wear.
- Compatibility issues noted with specific AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester, where premature wear was reported.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 is widely regarded as a reliable, performance-oriented winter tire that excels in dry and wet cold-weather conditions while maintaining commendable snow traction. Users consistently praise its longevity and sporty handling characteristics, making it a popular choice for high-powered rear-wheel-drive vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional longevity and tread life
- Strong performance in deep snow and slush
- Sporty handling and road-holding capabilities
- Reliable traction in cold, dry, and wet conditions
Cons
- Limited braking performance on pure ice
- Potential for increased road noise
- Susceptibility to saw-tooth wear patterns if not managed properly
Observations
- Highly effective on high-powered RWD sports cars and sedans, providing stability despite significant horsepower.
- Users reported consistent performance across both standard and run-flat configurations in 17 and 18-inch sizes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 — better comfort, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 84 vs 70 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 90 vs 77 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 84 vs 76 on handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 84 vs 78 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.