Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 89 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 90 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 93 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 77 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 88 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 | Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 86 |
| Dry | 85 | 89 |
| Wet | 85 | 87 |
| Snow | 90 | 84 |
| Comfort | 84 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 81 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 88 |
| Handling | 84 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 is widely regarded as a reliable, performance-oriented winter tire that excels in dry and wet cold-weather conditions while maintaining commendable snow traction. Users consistently praise its longevity and sporty handling characteristics, making it a popular choice for high-powered rear-wheel-drive vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional longevity and tread life
- Strong performance in deep snow and slush
- Sporty handling and road-holding capabilities
- Reliable traction in cold, dry, and wet conditions
Cons
- Limited braking performance on pure ice
- Potential for increased road noise
- Susceptibility to saw-tooth wear patterns if not managed properly
Observations
- Highly effective on high-powered RWD sports cars and sedans, providing stability despite significant horsepower.
- Users reported consistent performance across both standard and run-flat configurations in 17 and 18-inch sizes.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that offers exceptional value, frequently outperforming more expensive premium brands in wet and snowy conditions. While most users praise its balanced handling and impressive aquaplaning resistance, a small minority of drivers report concerns regarding ride comfort and noise levels.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Strong traction and confidence-inspiring grip in deep snow and ice
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Stable and predictable handling on dry and cold pavement
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise compared to summer tires
- Mixed feedback regarding ride comfort, with some users finding them stiff
- Occasional reports of suboptimal launch traction in wet conditions
Observations
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Ford Puma ST) noted that the tire maintains sporty characteristics without significant compromise.
- Users with AWD vehicles (e.g., Audi A4 Allroad) highlighted superior stability in deep water and snow, though some RWD users noted the importance of fitting all four tires to prevent rear-end instability.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Hankook
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 is stronger on snow and comfort. Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is stronger on dry and treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 90 vs 84 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 scores 84 vs 80 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 89 vs 85 on dry.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 88 vs 84 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.