Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 vs Falken Eurowinter HS01 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30

Winter High Performance tires

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
72
Snow
–
Comfort
69
Noise
–
Treadwear
76
Handling
56

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken Eurowinter HS01

Winter Premium Touring tires

Falken Eurowinter HS01 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
35 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
87
Snow
82
Comfort
42
Noise
82
Treadwear
90
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
77
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
89
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Professional tests (TWG score) – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 77 88
SimpleTire owners – 98

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 15
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
72
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
87
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Professional tests (TWG score) – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 72 89
SimpleTire owners – 97

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
–
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
82
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Professional tests (TWG score) – 79
Tyre Reviews owners – 83
SimpleTire owners – 96

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM30 leads by 27
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
69
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
42
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Professional tests (TWG score) – 12
Tyre Reviews owners 69 80
SimpleTire owners – 98

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
–
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
82
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76
SimpleTire owners – 92

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 14
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
76
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
90
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Tyre Reviews owners 76 88
SimpleTire owners – 94

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 20
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
56
B — Falken Eurowinter HS01
76
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM30Eurowinter HS01
Tyre Reviews owners 56 76

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 vs Falken Eurowinter HS01: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM30Falken Eurowinter HS01
Relative Score 71 80
Dry 77 89
Wet 72 87
Snow – 82
Comfort 69 42
Noise – 82
Treadwear 76 90
Handling 56 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak LM30

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on regional climate and driving expectations. While some drivers praise its competence in deep snow and wet conditions, others report inconsistent grip levels and premature tread degradation compared to competing winter tires.

Pros

  • Strong performance in deep snow and slushy conditions
  • Excellent resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
  • Progressive breakaway characteristics in dry, cold conditions
  • Improved steering response and low-speed feel in cold weather

Cons

  • Inconsistent grip on greasy or thawed road surfaces
  • Faster than expected tread wear for some users
  • Higher noise levels compared to summer tires
  • Performance perceived as inferior to top-tier competitors like Continental

Observations

  • Users with front-wheel-drive estate vehicles reported significant traction issues and surface polishing under heavy torque.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles like the Honda S2000 noted improved steering response despite increased road noise.
Tire B Falken Eurowinter HS01

The Falken Eurowinter HS01 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches above its price point, offering impressive performance in wet, snowy, and icy conditions. While a small minority of users report mixed results regarding wet-weather braking confidence, the vast majority of owners praise its quiet ride, durability, and reliable traction in challenging winter climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong traction and handling in deep snow and ice
  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a winter tire
  • Good tread longevity and durability

Cons

  • Higher rolling resistance noted by some users
  • Inconsistent braking confidence on wet or slick asphalt for a small subset of drivers
  • Increased road noise at higher speeds or when over-inflated
  • Dry road handling is described as adequate but not performance-oriented

Observations

  • Users with AWD vehicles (e.g., WRX, Ford Kuga) report that the tire complements all-wheel-drive systems effectively for snow navigation.
  • Drivers noted that the tire maintains comfort and low noise levels even on rough road surfaces, particularly when moving from 15-inch to 16-inch wheel sizes.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 B · Falken Eurowinter HS01
CategoryWinter High Performance tiresWinter Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—21
Rim diameters—17″ – 20″
Tread depth—11/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Falken

Winner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 scores 69 vs 42 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 76 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 87 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 90 vs 76 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
Tire B · Falken Eurowinter HS01

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.