Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 vs Falken Eurowinter HS01 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 12 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 56 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 | Falken Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 80 |
| Dry | 77 | 89 |
| Wet | 72 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 82 |
| Comfort | 69 | 42 |
| Noise | – | 82 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 90 |
| Handling | 56 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on regional climate and driving expectations. While some drivers praise its competence in deep snow and wet conditions, others report inconsistent grip levels and premature tread degradation compared to competing winter tires.
Pros
- Strong performance in deep snow and slushy conditions
- Excellent resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
- Progressive breakaway characteristics in dry, cold conditions
- Improved steering response and low-speed feel in cold weather
Cons
- Inconsistent grip on greasy or thawed road surfaces
- Faster than expected tread wear for some users
- Higher noise levels compared to summer tires
- Performance perceived as inferior to top-tier competitors like Continental
Observations
- Users with front-wheel-drive estate vehicles reported significant traction issues and surface polishing under heavy torque.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles like the Honda S2000 noted improved steering response despite increased road noise.
The Falken Eurowinter HS01 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches above its price point, offering impressive performance in wet, snowy, and icy conditions. While a small minority of users report mixed results regarding wet-weather braking confidence, the vast majority of owners praise its quiet ride, durability, and reliable traction in challenging winter climates.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Strong traction and handling in deep snow and ice
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a winter tire
- Good tread longevity and durability
Cons
- Higher rolling resistance noted by some users
- Inconsistent braking confidence on wet or slick asphalt for a small subset of drivers
- Increased road noise at higher speeds or when over-inflated
- Dry road handling is described as adequate but not performance-oriented
Observations
- Users with AWD vehicles (e.g., WRX, Ford Kuga) report that the tire complements all-wheel-drive systems effectively for snow navigation.
- Drivers noted that the tire maintains comfort and low noise levels even on rough road surfaces, particularly when moving from 15-inch to 16-inch wheel sizes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 | B · Falken Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 21 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Falken
Winner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 if comfort matters most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 scores 69 vs 42 on comfort.
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 76 vs 56 on handling.
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 87 vs 72 on wet.
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 90 vs 76 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.