80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Michelin Latitude Cross — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
59 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Latitude Cross — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 if snow and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 86 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 84 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Dueler H/T 689 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 74 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 82 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dueler H/T 689 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | Michelin Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 83 |
| Dry | 82 | 86 |
| Wet | 72 | 84 |
| Snow | 90 | 74 |
| Comfort | 71 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 93 | 89 |
| Handling | 70 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 presents a mixed performance profile, characterized by excellent tread longevity and reliable wet-weather grip on paved surfaces. However, users report significant shortcomings in ride comfort and off-road capability, specifically noting issues with road noise and handling stability on loose terrain.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong grip and traction in wet road conditions
- Reliable performance for standard on-road commuting
Cons
- Poor handling and traction on gravel or loose surfaces
- Noticeable road noise during highway travel
- Excessive bounciness affecting ride quality
Observations
- Users operating 4x4 vehicles primarily on-road report satisfaction with wet-weather performance.
- The tire is perceived as unsuitable for drivers seeking off-road capability despite the vehicle's 4x4 classification.
The Michelin Latitude Cross is widely regarded as a high-performing, versatile all-terrain tire that excels as a 'best-of-both-worlds' compromise for SUV and 4x4 owners. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather grip, impressive longevity, and off-road capability, noting it significantly outperforms standard factory-fitted tires in mixed-terrain conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and resistance to aquaplaning
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong off-road performance on mud, gravel, and grass
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on-road manners for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp rocks and punctures
- Increased fuel consumption compared to road-biased tires
- Performance degradation and hardening of the rubber compound over long-term aging (5+ years)
- Occasional reports of increased road noise at high motorway speeds
Observations
- Heavy 4x4 and SUV owners (e.g., Land Cruiser, Defender) report excellent load-carrying stability and longevity.
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted Bridgestone Duelers consistently report a 'night and day' improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence.
- Small 4x4 owners (e.g., Suzuki Jimny, Panda Cross) note improved off-road capability without sacrificing daily driving comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | B · Michelin Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
83
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Latitude Cross — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 if snow and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 scores 90 vs 74 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 84 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 82 vs 71 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 76 vs 70 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Cross
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 also compared with
Michelin Latitude Cross also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.