79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
16 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT vs Kumho Ecsta V720 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V720 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta V720 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE070R RFT leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | 54 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE070R RFT leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 45 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE070R RFT leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 25 | 50 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta V720 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 94 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT | Kumho Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 64 |
| Dry | 90 | 93 |
| Wet | 78 | 54 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 45 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 50 |
| Handling | 90 | 94 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT is a polarizing run-flat tire that excels in dry-weather performance and structural durability, though it faces criticism regarding its longevity and wet-weather handling. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and responsiveness, others report significant concerns regarding tread life and the high cost associated with the run-flat technology.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and handling responsiveness
- Effective run-flat capability providing peace of mind during emergencies
- Surprisingly low noise levels for a performance-oriented run-flat tire
- Robust sidewall construction that offers protection against road hazards
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or greasy road conditions
- Rapid tread wear leading to short service life for some users
- High price point compared to standard non-run-flat alternatives
- Susceptibility to sidewall ruptures under certain highway conditions
Observations
- Users noted that the tire maintains a surprisingly comfortable ride quality when transitioning from standard tires to these run-flats.
- High-power vehicle owners report that the tire's grip is excellent in dry conditions but becomes unpredictable and 'unnerving' in wet weather.
The Kumho Ecsta V720 is widely regarded as a high-value extreme performance tire that excels in dry-weather traction and steering feedback. While users appreciate its competitive pricing and capability for spirited street or casual track use, the trade-offs include rapid tread wear and significant road noise, which may deter those seeking a refined daily driving experience.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Precise steering feedback and firm sidewall construction
- Reliable performance for spirited street driving and casual track days
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Rapid tread wear
- Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some reports of hydroplaning
- Lack of comfort for daily commuting
Observations
- High-horsepower rear-wheel-drive vehicles (350hp-500hp) report excellent straight-line and cornering traction.
- Lightweight vehicles (sub-1 ton) may experience more pronounced issues with wet-weather grip and road noise.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT | B · Kumho Ecsta V720 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Bridgestone
64
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V720 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT scores 74 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT scores 78 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT scores 69 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta V720 scores 94 vs 90 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta V720
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT also compared with
Kumho Ecsta V720 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.