66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Michelin
Michelin Pilot Sport 3
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 3 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 RFT | Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 3 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 RFT | Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 3 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 RFT | Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 74 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 RFT | Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 3 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 RFT | Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | Michelin Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 83 |
| Dry | 68 | 93 |
| Wet | 59 | 86 |
| Comfort | 66 | 79 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 70 |
| Handling | 67 | 92 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT receives a polarized reception, primarily serving as an OEM-fitted tire for BMW vehicles. While some users appreciate its longevity and acceptable dry-weather performance, many report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction, ride harshness, and inconsistent tread life.
Pros
- Commendable tread longevity for some users, with reports of 30,000 to 50,000 miles
- Acceptable dry-road handling and stability for standard motorway driving
- Reliable run-flat functionality as an OEM solution
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and lack of confidence in rainy conditions
- Harsh ride quality characteristic of early-generation run-flat technology
- High road noise levels
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature replacement as early as 12,000-13,000 miles
Observations
- Users operating BMW 1-Series and 2-Series models frequently report dissatisfaction with grip levels compared to non-run-flat alternatives.
- Drivers of larger BMW 5-Series models reported higher mileage returns, suggesting the tire may perform better on heavier, long-distance touring vehicles.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Bridgestone
83
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 86 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 93 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 92 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 79 vs 66 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.