Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER33 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 75 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 59 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 57 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 51 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 90 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 62 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Bridgestone Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 70 |
| Dry | 83 | 75 |
| Wet | 76 | 59 |
| Comfort | 71 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 88 |
| Handling | 73 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER300 is widely regarded as a reliable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in dry conditions and provides predictable handling for daily commuting. While many users praise its longevity and consistent performance, a significant portion of the user base reports issues with increased road noise, a firm ride, and a noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability, with many users reporting high mileage.
- Strong, predictable dry-weather handling and stability.
- Good value for money as a premium touring option.
- Consistent performance across a wide variety of vehicle types.
Cons
- Significant road noise, particularly on older or rougher asphalt surfaces.
- Noticeable deterioration in wet-weather traction and braking as the tire ages.
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality that lacks comfort on uneven roads.
- Poor performance in snow and near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or high-torque diesel engines reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
- Drivers using lower-profile sizes (e.g., 45-series) frequently noted a harsher, less comfortable ride quality.
- Some owners of compact cars noted that the tire's stiff sidewall contributed to a 'nervous' or 'twitchy' handling feel on certain road surfaces.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER33 is widely recognized as a highly durable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in dry conditions but frequently underperforms in wet weather and comfort metrics. While many users appreciate its longevity and robust construction, the consensus points to significant issues regarding excessive road noise and inconsistent wet-weather traction.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling
- Stiff sidewall construction
- Consistent performance for daily commuting
Cons
- High levels of cabin and road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Mediocre ride comfort and impact absorption
- Unpredictable handling in cold or wet conditions
Observations
- Users on compact vehicles like the Mazda 3 report generally higher satisfaction with handling, whereas owners of premium vehicles like the Lexus IS350 often find the tire's noise and lack of refinement disappointing for the vehicle class.
- Drivers of MPVs and heavier vehicles appreciate the tire's ability to handle load and road abuse, though they note a significant trade-off in ride harshness.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Bridgestone Turanza ER33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza ER33 if treadwear matters most to you.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 76 vs 59 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 71 vs 58 on comfort.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 73 vs 62 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 scores 88 vs 78 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.