74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
67/100
108 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Kumho Ecsta LE Sport — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Turanza T001 and Kumho Ecsta LE Sport are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza T001 is stronger on wet. Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is stronger on treadwear, comfort and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta LE Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Turanza T001 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 72 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta LE Sport leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 74 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta LE Sport leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta LE Sport leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 72 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Kumho Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 75 |
| Dry | 79 | 81 |
| Wet | 88 | 76 |
| Comfort | 72 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 72 |
| Handling | 67 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 10% #10/11 · 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test | +10 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T001 receives a polarized reception from users, often serving as a divisive factory-fitted tire. While many drivers appreciate its dry-weather handling, steering feedback, and comfort, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Solid dry-weather grip and handling
- Responsive steering feedback
- Generally comfortable ride quality
- Good value for money at certain price points
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
- High road noise levels on certain surfaces
- Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall softness
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles frequently report understeer and rapid front-tire wear compared to rear-axle longevity.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-performance driving styles noted significantly lower mileage expectations than the tire's touring classification suggests.
- Some users on 17-inch and larger wheels noted that the tire's sidewall stiffness can lead to a harsh ride on imperfect road surfaces.
The Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that punches above its price point, offering impressive dry and wet grip for spirited driving. While many users praise its handling characteristics and comfort, opinions are polarized regarding its long-term durability and road noise, with some reports of inconsistent tread wear and sidewall fragility.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry and wet traction
- Predictable, progressive handling at the limit
- Improved ride comfort compared to some OEM alternatives
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle setups
- Reports of sidewall weakness and bubbling
- Increased road noise on imperfect surfaces
- Performance drop-off as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
Observations
- Users with high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles frequently reported accelerated front-tire wear.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles (e.g., Alfa Romeo 159) noted that the tire performs well initially but may struggle with the vehicle's weight over time.
- Owners of performance-oriented cars (e.g., Golf R, Audi RS4) noted that the tire provides excellent value for rear-axle fitments.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 | B · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
75
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Bridgestone Turanza T001 and Kumho Ecsta LE Sport are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza T001 is stronger on wet. Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is stronger on treadwear, comfort and handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 88 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 78 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 72 vs 67 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T001
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza T001 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.