Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
78
Snow
–
Comfort
65
Noise
–
Treadwear
57
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Summer Max Performance tires

Hankook Ventus S1 evo tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
62 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
82
Snow
80
Comfort
76
Noise
89
Treadwear
77
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 3
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
84
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
87
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005 RFTVentus S1 evo
Professional tests (TWG score) – 89
Tire Rack owners 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 83 81

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 4
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
78
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
82
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005 RFTVentus S1 evo
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
–
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 11
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
65
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
76
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005 RFTVentus S1 evo
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 63 72

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
–
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
89
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005 RFTVentus S1 evo
Professional tests (TWG score) – 95

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 20
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
57
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
77
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005 RFTVentus S1 evo
Tire Rack owners 66 –
Tyre Reviews owners 56 75

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 RFT leads by 3
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
76
B — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
73
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005 RFTVentus S1 evo
Tyre Reviews owners 76 73

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005 RFTHankook Ventus S1 evo
Relative Score 71 79
Dry 84 87
Wet 78 82
Snow – 80
Comfort 65 76
Noise – 89
Treadwear 57 77
Handling 76 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT

The Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT receives mixed feedback, often praised for its initial comfort and steering precision but frequently criticized for premature tread wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages. While many users appreciate its performance as a touring tire, the run-flat construction appears to be a polarizing feature that significantly impacts long-term ride quality and durability.

Pros

  • Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
  • Responsive and direct steering feedback
  • Strong dry and wet braking performance
  • Low noise levels when new

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
  • Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
  • Harsh ride quality compared to non-run-flat alternatives

Observations

  • BMW 3-series owners report a notable decline in ride quality and noise levels as the tires approach the end of their service life.
  • Lexus UX owners have reported extreme cabin noise levels, suggesting the tire's acoustic profile may be poorly suited to certain vehicle chassis.
Tire B Hankook Ventus S1 evo

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that bridges the gap between premium pricing and budget accessibility. While many users praise its excellent wet and dry traction and progressive handling characteristics, experiences regarding tread longevity and road noise are notably polarized, often depending on vehicle weight and driving style.

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry grip performance
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling at the limit
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Effective hydroplaning resistance

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear life across different vehicle platforms
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
  • Occasional difficulty with balancing and road-force vibration
  • Performance drop-off as the tire ages or reaches lower tread depths

Observations

  • Users with Audi Quattro models frequently report high satisfaction with the tire as an OE replacement, citing a balanced feel.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta) report highly variable experiences, with some noting excellent longevity while others report poor wet-weather performance in specific small-diameter sizes.
  • High-torque or heavier vehicles occasionally report rapid rear-tire wear and a 'twitchy' feeling when using run-flat variants.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Hankook

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 77 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 76 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 82 vs 78 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT scores 76 vs 73 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.