Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 81 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 73 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 72 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 95 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 56 | 75 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | Hankook Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 79 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 78 | 82 |
| Snow | – | 80 |
| Comfort | 65 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 89 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 77 |
| Handling | 76 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT receives mixed feedback, often praised for its initial comfort and steering precision but frequently criticized for premature tread wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages. While many users appreciate its performance as a touring tire, the run-flat construction appears to be a polarizing feature that significantly impacts long-term ride quality and durability.
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
- Low noise levels when new
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
- Harsh ride quality compared to non-run-flat alternatives
Observations
- BMW 3-series owners report a notable decline in ride quality and noise levels as the tires approach the end of their service life.
- Lexus UX owners have reported extreme cabin noise levels, suggesting the tire's acoustic profile may be poorly suited to certain vehicle chassis.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that bridges the gap between premium pricing and budget accessibility. While many users praise its excellent wet and dry traction and progressive handling characteristics, experiences regarding tread longevity and road noise are notably polarized, often depending on vehicle weight and driving style.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry grip performance
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling at the limit
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Effective hydroplaning resistance
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life across different vehicle platforms
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
- Occasional difficulty with balancing and road-force vibration
- Performance drop-off as the tire ages or reaches lower tread depths
Observations
- Users with Audi Quattro models frequently report high satisfaction with the tire as an OE replacement, citing a balanced feel.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta) report highly variable experiences, with some noting excellent longevity while others report poor wet-weather performance in specific small-diameter sizes.
- High-torque or heavier vehicles occasionally report rapid rear-tire wear and a 'twitchy' feeling when using run-flat variants.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT if handling matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 77 vs 57 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 76 vs 65 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 82 vs 78 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT scores 76 vs 73 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.