Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 95% | 89% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 40 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 95 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 75 |
| Dry | 87 | 78 |
| Wet | 82 | 81 |
| Snow | 80 | 76 |
| Comfort | 76 | 56 |
| Noise | 89 | 87 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 72 |
| Handling | 73 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 89% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +0.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 20% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +13.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 90% #8/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -8.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +0.1 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that bridges the gap between premium pricing and budget accessibility. While many users praise its excellent wet and dry traction and progressive handling characteristics, experiences regarding tread longevity and road noise are notably polarized, often depending on vehicle weight and driving style.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry grip performance
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling at the limit
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Effective hydroplaning resistance
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life across different vehicle platforms
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
- Occasional difficulty with balancing and road-force vibration
- Performance drop-off as the tire ages or reaches lower tread depths
Observations
- Users with Audi Quattro models frequently report high satisfaction with the tire as an OE replacement, citing a balanced feel.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta) report highly variable experiences, with some noting excellent longevity while others report poor wet-weather performance in specific small-diameter sizes.
- High-torque or heavier vehicles occasionally report rapid rear-tire wear and a 'twitchy' feeling when using run-flat variants.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Nexen
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 76 vs 56 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 87 vs 78 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 77 vs 72 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 80 vs 76 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.