Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Summer Max Performance tires

Hankook Ventus S1 evo tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
62 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
82
Snow
80
Comfort
76
Noise
89
Treadwear
77
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU1

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
81
Snow
76
Comfort
56
Noise
87
Treadwear
72
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 9
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
87
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
78
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 75
Tyre Reviews owners 81 82
SimpleTire owners – 93
Dry Braking (% of best) 95% 89%
Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 98%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 1
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
82
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
81
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 85
Tyre Reviews owners 73 75
SimpleTire owners – 89
Wet Braking (% of best) 96% 94%
Wet Handling (% of best) 98% 98%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 4
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
80
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
76
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
SimpleTire owners – 78

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 20
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
76
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
56
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 40
Tyre Reviews owners 72 79
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 2
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
89
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
87
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) 95 85
SimpleTire owners – 91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 5
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
77
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
72
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
Tyre Reviews owners 75 71
SimpleTire owners – 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU1 leads by 2
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
73
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
75
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
Tyre Reviews owners 73 75

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Nexen N Fera SU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evoNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 80 75
Dry 87 78
Wet 82 81
Snow 80 76
Comfort 76 56
Noise 89 87
Treadwear 77 72
Handling 73 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 95% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 89% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test +6 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 98% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +1.3 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 98% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test -1.7 Different tests
Noise Other 100% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +0.7 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 33% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 20% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +13.3 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 90% #8/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test -8.4 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +1.9 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 98% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +0.1 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus S1 evo

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that bridges the gap between premium pricing and budget accessibility. While many users praise its excellent wet and dry traction and progressive handling characteristics, experiences regarding tread longevity and road noise are notably polarized, often depending on vehicle weight and driving style.

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry grip performance
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling at the limit
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Effective hydroplaning resistance

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear life across different vehicle platforms
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
  • Occasional difficulty with balancing and road-force vibration
  • Performance drop-off as the tire ages or reaches lower tread depths

Observations

  • Users with Audi Quattro models frequently report high satisfaction with the tire as an OE replacement, citing a balanced feel.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta) report highly variable experiences, with some noting excellent longevity while others report poor wet-weather performance in specific small-diameter sizes.
  • High-torque or heavier vehicles occasionally report rapid rear-tire wear and a 'twitchy' feeling when using run-flat variants.
Tire B Nexen N Fera SU1

The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Very low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
  • Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
  • Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
  • Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
  • Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—58
Rim diameters—16″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Nexen

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 76 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 87 vs 78 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 77 vs 72 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 80 vs 76 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.