Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Summer Max Performance tires

Hankook Ventus S1 evo tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
62 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
82
Snow
80
Comfort
76
Noise
89
Treadwear
77
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Laufenn

Laufenn S FIT AS

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Laufenn S FIT AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
35 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
82
Snow
60
Comfort
88
Noise
90
Treadwear
85
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo if snow matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 5
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
87
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
92
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 81 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
82
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
82
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
Tire Rack owners – 79
Tyre Reviews owners 73 66

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo leads by 20
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
80
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
60
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 66
Tyre Reviews owners – 10

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 12
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
76
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
88
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 72 84

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 1
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
89
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
90
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 95 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 8
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
77
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
85
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 75 72

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 3
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo
73
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
76
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evoS FIT AS
Tyre Reviews owners 73 76

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Laufenn S FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evoLaufenn S FIT AS
Relative Score 80 82
Dry 87 92
Wet 82 82
Snow 80 60
Comfort 76 88
Noise 89 90
Treadwear 77 85
Handling 73 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus S1 evo

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that bridges the gap between premium pricing and budget accessibility. While many users praise its excellent wet and dry traction and progressive handling characteristics, experiences regarding tread longevity and road noise are notably polarized, often depending on vehicle weight and driving style.

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry grip performance
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling at the limit
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Effective hydroplaning resistance

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear life across different vehicle platforms
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
  • Occasional difficulty with balancing and road-force vibration
  • Performance drop-off as the tire ages or reaches lower tread depths

Observations

  • Users with Audi Quattro models frequently report high satisfaction with the tire as an OE replacement, citing a balanced feel.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta) report highly variable experiences, with some noting excellent longevity while others report poor wet-weather performance in specific small-diameter sizes.
  • High-torque or heavier vehicles occasionally report rapid rear-tire wear and a 'twitchy' feeling when using run-flat variants.
Tire B Laufenn S FIT AS

The Laufenn S Fit AS is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that delivers impressive comfort and low road noise, often outperforming its price point. While most users praise its dry-weather handling and ride quality, there is a notable consensus regarding its limitations in wet-weather traction and potential concerns regarding long-term sidewall durability.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Easy to balance and install

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction
  • Reports of premature sidewall issues or blowouts
  • Tread life may be shorter than premium alternatives
  • Performance can degrade significantly as the tire wears

Observations

  • Users with high-torque vehicles, such as rear-wheel-drive EVs or powerful sedans, report significant traction loss in wet conditions.
  • Drivers on larger wheel diameters (19-inch+) noted that while the tire is quiet, road noise is still perceptible due to the lower profile nature of the fitment.
  • Some users on rougher road surfaces reported faster tread wear and sidewall vulnerability.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo B · Laufenn S FIT AS
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresAll Season Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Laufenn

Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 80 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 88 vs 76 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 85 vs 77 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 92 vs 87 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.