76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
45 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
31 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama C Drive2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 79 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 81 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
C Drive2 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 71 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Weather Control A005 EVO | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 69 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 74 |
| Dry | 85 | 79 |
| Wet | 88 | 73 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 84 | 81 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 55 | 71 |
| Handling | 77 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO is widely regarded as a top-tier performer in wet conditions, offering exceptional grip and aquaplaning resistance that often exceeds competitor benchmarks. While users frequently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and initial performance, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of rapid tread wear and a significant decline in performance as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong initial performance in cold and damp conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency compared to some summer-oriented tires
Cons
- Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
- Noticeable drop-off in performance as the tread wears down
- Reports of tread block cracking and structural deformation
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles and EVs frequently reported faster-than-expected tread wear, often requiring replacement before 20,000 miles.
- Drivers transitioning from run-flat tires or stiff summer tires noted a significant improvement in ride quality and suspension compliance.
- Some users observed that moving to larger rim sizes (e.g., 17-inch) provided better handling stability compared to smaller 16-inch configurations.
The Yokohama C Drive2 is widely regarded as a comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality, making it a popular choice for daily commuters. While many users praise its wet and dry grip, performance is polarizing; some drivers report excellent handling, while others find the grip limits unpredictable or insufficient for spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
- Low road noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance for most users
- Good value for money
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
- Sudden loss of grip at the limit
- Noise levels may increase significantly as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with stiffly sprung or performance-tuned vehicles (e.g., Golf GTI, modified hatchbacks) often appreciate the tire's ability to mitigate suspension harshness.
- Drivers of heavier or higher-powered vehicles reported mixed results, with some noting excellent stability and others experiencing rapid, uneven tread wear.
- The tire is frequently cited as a significant comfort upgrade over OE-fitted performance tires on mid-sized sedans.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | B · Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Bridgestone
74
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama C Drive2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama C Drive2 scores 71 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 88 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 77 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 85 vs 79 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO also compared with
Yokohama C Drive2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.