73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
31 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Nexen N Fera SU1 and Yokohama C Drive2 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on wet and handling. Yokohama C Drive2 is stronger on comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
C Drive2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 78 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
C Drive2 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 40 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 69 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU1 | Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 74 |
| Dry | 78 | 79 |
| Wet | 81 | 73 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 56 | 81 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 71 |
| Handling | 75 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
The Yokohama C Drive2 is widely regarded as a comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality, making it a popular choice for daily commuters. While many users praise its wet and dry grip, performance is polarizing; some drivers report excellent handling, while others find the grip limits unpredictable or insufficient for spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
- Low road noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance for most users
- Good value for money
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
- Sudden loss of grip at the limit
- Noise levels may increase significantly as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with stiffly sprung or performance-tuned vehicles (e.g., Golf GTI, modified hatchbacks) often appreciate the tire's ability to mitigate suspension harshness.
- Drivers of heavier or higher-powered vehicles reported mixed results, with some noting excellent stability and others experiencing rapid, uneven tread wear.
- The tire is frequently cited as a significant comfort upgrade over OE-fitted performance tires on mid-sized sedans.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU1 | B · Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 58 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Nexen
74
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Nexen N Fera SU1 and Yokohama C Drive2 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on wet and handling. Yokohama C Drive2 is stronger on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama C Drive2 scores 81 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 81 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 75 vs 69 on handling.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
Yokohama C Drive2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.