85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Michelin Power Cup Evo — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
82/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 2 | Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 2 | Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 2 | Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 85 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 2 | Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 2 | Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 78 |
| Dry | 98 | 94 |
| Wet | 80 | 70 |
| Comfort | 93 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 70 |
| Handling | 95 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSportAttack 2 is highly regarded by sportbike riders for its exceptional grip, rapid warm-up times, and predictable handling characteristics. While it excels in both spirited road riding and track day applications, users note that its performance-oriented compound leads to relatively rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive riding conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
- Strong performance in both track and street environments
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Observations
- Riders of middleweight and liter-class sportbikes (e.g., ZX6R, Speed Triple 1050) report high satisfaction with cornering confidence.
- Commuters note that the tire's longevity is significantly reduced by high-mileage daily use, making it less ideal for non-sporting utility.
The Michelin Power Cup Evo is regarded as a highly capable, performance-oriented tire that excels in grip and handling dynamics. Users report that it performs exceptionally well in spirited riding and driving scenarios, often drawing favorable comparisons to dedicated slick tires and other premium performance rubber.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
- Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups
- Reliable longevity for specialized applications like supermoto
Cons
- Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
- Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
- Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
Observations
- Users report excellent synergy between the tire and high-performance chassis platforms like the BMW E46 M3.
- The tire demonstrates high-level performance in niche applications, specifically noted for its 'glue-like' handling on supermoto motorcycles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
Continental
78
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 80 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 95 vs 85 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 93 vs 85 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 98 vs 94 on dry.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Tire B · Michelin Power Cup Evo
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 also compared with
Michelin Power Cup Evo also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.