78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Continental CrossContact A/TR — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossContact A/TR leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 89 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 81 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 74 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact A/TR leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact A/TR leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Continental CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 80 |
| Dry | 88 | 89 |
| Wet | 83 | 81 |
| Snow | 81 | – |
| Comfort | 83 | 74 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 79 |
| Handling | 74 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Continental CrossContact A/TR is widely regarded as a highly durable and versatile all-terrain tire, praised for its exceptional longevity and strong performance across varied road conditions. While most users report excellent traction in wet and snowy environments, a minority of owners have expressed concerns regarding ride comfort and inconsistent warranty support from the manufacturer.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong traction in both wet and dry road conditions
- Impressive snow and ice performance for an all-terrain tire
- Aesthetically pleasing tread and sidewall design
Cons
- Reports of a jarring or uncomfortable ride quality
- Inconsistent customer service regarding warranty claims
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
- Mixed feedback on hydroplaning resistance
Observations
- Users operating these tires on SUVs like the Mercedes ML report high confidence in challenging winter conditions.
- Owners of vehicles like the Subaru Forester have noted the tire's ability to maintain performance over extremely high mileage (exceeding 130,000 km).
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Continental CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 600 - 680 A A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
80
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 79 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 74 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 80 vs 74 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Continental CrossContact A/TR
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Continental CrossContact A/TR also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.