90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
92/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Nexen N Fera RU5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera RU5 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera RU5 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 97 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Nexen N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 87 |
| Dry | 82 | 91 |
| Wet | 92 | 88 |
| Snow | 94 | 76 |
| Comfort | 94 | 92 |
| Noise | 93 | 91 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 87 |
| Handling | 85 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
90
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Nexen N'Fera RU5 is widely regarded as a high-value tire that delivers performance comparable to premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While most users praise its wet-weather traction, longevity, and comfort, there is a notable divide regarding its winter capabilities, with some users reporting poor performance in snow.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in snow and icy conditions
- Potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
- Marketed as all-season but perceived by some as better suited for summer/wet climates
Observations
- Users on larger 20-inch wheels reported a significant improvement in noise levels and comfort compared to factory-fitted performance tires.
- The tire demonstrates high durability on front-wheel-drive configurations, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage compared to other performance-oriented brands.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Nexen N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
90
/ 100
Continental
87
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera RU5 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 76 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera RU5 scores 91 vs 82 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 88 on wet.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Nexen N Fera RU5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX25 also compared with
Nexen N Fera RU5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.