Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental ExtremeContact DW

Summer High Performance tires

Continental ExtremeContact DW tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
91
Snow
Comfort
83
Noise
Treadwear
60
Handling
63

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
152 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
85
Snow
67
Comfort
84
Noise
92
Treadwear
78
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental ExtremeContact DW if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DW leads by 2
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
93
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
91
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners 87
Tyre Reviews owners 93 87
SimpleTire owners 100

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DW leads by 6
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
91
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
85
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners 81
Tyre Reviews owners 91 81
SimpleTire owners 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
67
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
SimpleTire owners 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 1
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
83
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
84
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners 82
Tyre Reviews owners 83 77
SimpleTire owners 100

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
92
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
SimpleTire owners 100

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 18
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
60
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
78
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners 72
Tyre Reviews owners 60 73
SimpleTire owners 60

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 16
A — Continental ExtremeContact DW
63
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
79
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWVentus V12 evo2
Tyre Reviews owners 63 79

Scores at a glance

Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact DWHankook Ventus V12 evo2
Relative Score 77 83
Dry 93 91
Wet 91 85
Snow 67
Comfort 83 84
Noise 92
Treadwear 60 78
Handling 63 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ExtremeContact DW

The Continental ExtremeContact DW is widely regarded for its exceptional wet and dry grip, making it a strong performer for highway cruising and daily driving. However, the tire is frequently criticized for its soft sidewall construction, which compromises steering precision and handling responsiveness, alongside concerns regarding rapid tread wear and structural durability.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High levels of stability and comfort during highway driving
  • Confident performance in summer conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel and handling
  • Rapid tread wear and short service life
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage and bubbles from road hazards
  • Increased road noise levels

Observations

  • Drivers of sporty hatchbacks like the Golf GTI reported that the soft sidewalls negatively impacted the vehicle's intended handling characteristics.
  • Users noted that the tire's lack of structural rigidity often necessitates running higher-than-recommended tire pressures to improve steering feedback.
Tire B Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.

Pros

  • Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
  • Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
  • Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
  • Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
  • Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
  • Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
  • Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact DW B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
CategorySummer High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″
UTQG340 A A
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Hankook

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental ExtremeContact DW if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 78 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 79 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 91 vs 85 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DW
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.