Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental IceContact 2 vs Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | IceContact 2 | Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 82 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | IceContact 2 | Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 97 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 82 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | IceContact 2 | Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 90 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | IceContact 2 | Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 79 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | IceContact 2 | Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 87 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | IceContact 2 | Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 69 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental IceContact 2 | Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 87 |
| Dry | 88 | 94 |
| Wet | 90 | 92 |
| Snow | 85 | 86 |
| Comfort | 65 | 92 |
| Noise | – | 89 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 88 |
| Handling | 85 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental IceContact 2 is highly regarded as a robust winter tire, particularly well-suited for harsh Nordic and Baltic climates. Users consistently praise its exceptional grip on snow and ice, noting that while it performs well, its acoustic profile and ice-traction longevity are typical trade-offs for a studded tire.
Pros
- Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
- Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
- Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions
- Strong performance on mixed and rural road surfaces
Cons
- Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
- Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
- Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
Observations
- Users operating in rural or mixed-road environments report higher satisfaction than those primarily on dry highways.
- The tire is specifically noted for its suitability in extreme northern climates like Sweden and the Baltic region.
The Pirelli Scorpion Ice & Snow is widely regarded as a highly capable winter tire, particularly for heavy SUVs and 4x4 vehicles. Users frequently praise its exceptional traction on ice and deep snow, with many noting that it provides significant confidence in extreme winter conditions. While some users report concerns regarding tread longevity and dry-pavement noise, the consensus remains that it is a premium, reliable choice for severe weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction on ice and packed snow
- High durability and long tread life for many users
- Strong performance in varied winter conditions including slush and mud
- Reliable handling and stability for heavy SUVs and towing applications
Cons
- Increased road noise on dry pavement
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
- Stiffer ride quality compared to non-winter tires
- Reduced performance in off-road mud conditions for certain rim sizes
Observations
- Users with heavy vehicles like Land Rover Discovery and Toyota Land Cruiser report excellent performance, even when towing heavy loads.
- Some users noted that smaller rim sizes (e.g., 16-inch) appeared to offer better off-road mud performance than larger 17-inch variants on similar vehicle platforms.
- Drivers of high-performance SUVs (e.g., BMW X5) noted faster-than-expected tread wear, suggesting the compound may be sensitive to aggressive driving styles.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental IceContact 2 | B · Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Pirelli
Winner: Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Continental IceContact 2 if handling matters most to you.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 92 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental IceContact 2 scores 85 vs 69 on handling.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 88 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 94 vs 88 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.