Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Turanza T001 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
67/100
108 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
88
Comfort
72
Noise
–
Treadwear
63
Handling
67

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
25 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
384 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
85
Comfort
62
Noise
84
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better handling and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T001 if comfort and wet matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 1
A — Bridgestone Turanza T001
79
B — Falken Azenis FK510
80
Why this score
SourceTuranza T001Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score) 78 74
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 80 88
SimpleTire owners – 97
Dry Braking (% of best) 95% 95%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Turanza T001 leads by 3
A — Bridgestone Turanza T001
88
B — Falken Azenis FK510
85
Why this score
SourceTuranza T001Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 84
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 70 88
SimpleTire owners – 91
Wet Braking (% of best) 100% 96%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T001 leads by 10
A — Bridgestone Turanza T001
72
B — Falken Azenis FK510
62
Why this score
SourceTuranza T001Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score) – 49
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 72 77
SimpleTire owners – 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Turanza T001
–
B — Falken Azenis FK510
84
Why this score
SourceTuranza T001Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score) – 73
SimpleTire owners – 88

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Turanza T001
63
B — Falken Azenis FK510
75
Why this score
SourceTuranza T001Azenis FK510
Tire Rack owners – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 63 71
SimpleTire owners – 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 14
A — Bridgestone Turanza T001
67
B — Falken Azenis FK510
81
Why this score
SourceTuranza T001Azenis FK510
Tyre Reviews owners 67 81
DriverReviews owners 84 86

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T001Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 74 77
Dry 79 80
Wet 88 85
Comfort 72 62
Noise – 84
Treadwear 63 75
Handling 67 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 95% #6/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -0.1 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 81% #10/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 85% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test -3.8 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 20% #5/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test +1.6 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 96% #3/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test +4.3 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza T001

The Bridgestone Turanza T001 receives a polarized reception from users, often serving as a divisive factory-fitted tire. While many drivers appreciate its dry-weather handling, steering feedback, and comfort, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature tread wear.

Pros

  • Solid dry-weather grip and handling
  • Responsive steering feedback
  • Generally comfortable ride quality
  • Good value for money at certain price points

Cons

  • Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
  • Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
  • High road noise levels on certain surfaces
  • Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall softness

Observations

  • Users with FWD vehicles frequently report understeer and rapid front-tire wear compared to rear-axle longevity.
  • Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-performance driving styles noted significantly lower mileage expectations than the tire's touring classification suggests.
  • Some users on 17-inch and larger wheels noted that the tire's sidewall stiffness can lead to a harsh ride on imperfect road surfaces.
Tire B Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza T001

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available268
Rim diameters17″17″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Falken

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better handling and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T001 if comfort and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 81 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 75 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 88 vs 85 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T001
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.