93
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
663 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken Landair A/T T110 vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Falken Landair A/T T110 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Landair A/T T110 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Landair A/T T110 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Landair A/T T110 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Landair A/T T110 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Landair A/T T110 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Landair A/T T110 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 67 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Landair A/T T110 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Landair A/T T110 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Landair A/T T110 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Landair A/T T110 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Landair A/T T110 | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 93 | 79 |
| Dry | 96 | 83 |
| Wet | 93 | 83 |
| Snow | 88 | – |
| Comfort | 93 | 67 |
| Noise | 89 | – |
| Treadwear | 91 | 77 |
| Handling | 94 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
93
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Landair A/T T110 (often associated with the Wildpeak/Rubitrek product line) is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-terrain tire that excels in mixed-weather conditions. Most users report a successful balance between aggressive off-road capability and daily-driver comfort, though some note a slight increase in road noise and a minor reduction in fuel efficiency compared to stock highway tires.
Pros
- Excellent year-round traction in rain, snow, and light mud.
- Strong off-road performance on dirt, gravel, and rocky trails.
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Aggressive, aesthetically pleasing sidewall design.
- Surprisingly quiet and smooth ride for an all-terrain tire.
Cons
- Minor decrease in fuel economy (MPG) for many users.
- Some reports of steering feeling 'spongy' or less responsive on pavement.
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by a minority of users.
- Tread life may fall short of expectations if driven aggressively on rough terrain.
Observations
- Subaru owners (Forester, Outback, Crosstrek) frequently cite these as the ideal upgrade for improved trail confidence without sacrificing daily comfort.
- Hybrid vehicle owners (RAV4 Hybrid) report a noticeable but manageable drop in fuel efficiency (approx. 2-4 MPG).
- Users with larger trucks and SUVs (Tundra, 4Runner) generally praise the tire's stability while towing and its ability to handle varied terrain.
The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
- Reliable dry handling performance
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Observations
- Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
- Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Landair A/T T110 | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
93
/ 100
Falken
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Falken Landair A/T T110 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Landair A/T T110 scores 93 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken Landair A/T T110 scores 91 vs 77 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Landair A/T T110 scores 96 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Landair A/T T110 scores 94 vs 83 on handling.
Tire A · Falken Landair A/T T110
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Landair A/T T110 also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.