Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Firestone RoadHawk — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk 900 | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 83 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk 900 | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk 900 | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 39 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 71 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk 900 | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk 900 | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 55 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk 900 | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 63 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 66 |
| Dry | 78 | 84 |
| Wet | 80 | 75 |
| Comfort | 90 | 52 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 55 |
| Handling | 85 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Firehawk 900 is generally regarded as a reliable, balanced tire that offers commendable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its durability and comfort over rough road surfaces, the consensus is frequently tempered by reports of significant road noise, particularly with run-flat variants.
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Observations
- Users operating on poor road infrastructure report high satisfaction with the tire's structural integrity.
- Owners of premium vehicles like the Audi TT have reported dissatisfaction with noise levels when using run-flat versions of this tire.
The Firestone RoadHawk is a polarizing mid-range tire that excels in comfort and wet-weather grip for daily commuting but suffers from significant durability concerns. While many users praise its value and performance on smaller, lighter vehicles, a substantial portion of owners report rapid, uneven tread wear and soft sidewalls that compromise handling precision during spirited driving.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Competitive price point compared to premium brands
- Effective performance for standard, non-sporty daily driving
Cons
- Rapid and often uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'mushy' feel and visual appearance of under-inflation
- Lack of steering feedback and precision in cornering
- Reports of premature cracking or perishing in low-mileage scenarios
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, Golf) report higher satisfaction regarding comfort and handling compared to owners of heavier diesel estates or vans.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles frequently report significant sidewall deflection and poor cornering confidence, often requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
- The tire is frequently criticized for lack of stability when fitted to commercial vans, with users noting a 'wobbling' sensation under load.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Firestone RoadHawk if dry matters most to you.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 90 vs 52 on comfort.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 88 vs 55 on treadwear.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 85 vs 63 on handling.
Firestone RoadHawk scores 84 vs 78 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.