Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Firestone

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
1,452 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
84
Snow
63
Comfort
85
Noise
87
Treadwear
81
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan A050

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Yokohama Advan A050 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
97
Wet
48
Snow
Comfort
64
Noise
Treadwear
35
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A050 leads by 4
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
93
B — Yokohama Advan A050
97
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 93
Tyre Reviews owners 84 97
SimpleTire owners 96

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 36
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
84
B — Yokohama Advan A050
48
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 84
Tyre Reviews owners 69 48
SimpleTire owners 85

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
63
B — Yokohama Advan A050
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
SimpleTire owners 63

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 21
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
85
B — Yokohama Advan A050
64
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 85
Tyre Reviews owners 75 64
SimpleTire owners 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
87
B — Yokohama Advan A050
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
SimpleTire owners 87

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 46
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
81
B — Yokohama Advan A050
35
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 81
Tyre Reviews owners 65 35
SimpleTire owners 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A050 leads by 9
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
83
B — Yokohama Advan A050
92
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Advan A050
Tyre Reviews owners 83 92

Scores at a glance

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Yokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 85 61
Dry 93 97
Wet 84 48
Snow 63
Comfort 85 64
Noise 87
Treadwear 81 35
Handling 83 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is widely regarded as a premier 'bang-for-the-buck' ultra-high-performance summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional dry grip, sharp steering response, and aggressive aesthetic, often noting that it performs at a level comparable to significantly more expensive premium tires. While some users report concerns regarding tread life and wet-weather hydroplaning resistance, the general consensus is that it offers an unbeatable value proposition for spirited daily driving.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Aggressive, sporty tread design
  • Responsive steering and predictable handling characteristics
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially with aggressive driving
  • Reduced hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain or deep standing water
  • Poor performance and potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
  • Some reports of sidewall softness or 'mushy' feel under extreme load

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., Mustangs, Camaros, Chargers) frequently report improved launch traction compared to OEM tires.
  • Drivers of smaller, lightweight sports cars (e.g., Miata, BRZ, Mini) often highlight the tire's ability to transform handling and steering precision.
  • Some users noted that the tire runs slightly narrow for its stated size, leading to less rim protection and a 'stretched' look on wider wheels.
Tire B Yokohama Advan A050

The Yokohama Advan A050 is widely regarded as a premier R-spec semi-slick tire, offering class-leading dry grip and exceptional handling feedback for time attack and track-focused enthusiasts. While users praise its consistent performance and predictable nature, they acknowledge that its high cost and rapid tread wear necessitate a dedicated use case, as it is not optimized for wet conditions or daily commuting.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
  • Rapid warm-up time providing confidence from cold

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
  • Compound-dependent performance variability

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on suspension tuning, as the extreme grip levels can overwhelm poorly set-up vehicles.
  • Front-wheel drive users reported significantly faster wear on front tires compared to the rear, with an estimated lifespan of 5,000 km to 7,000 km.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community opinion on the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is largely positive, praising it as an affordable, high-performing summer tire with great dry grip, impressive wet performance for its price class, and good ride comfort. While some enthusiasts note a slightly softer sidewall response compared to more expensive tier-one options like Michelins, the overwhelming consensus highlights its exceptional value.

r/FiestaST ·22 upvotes ·2018-04-09

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

r/MINI ·20 upvotes ·2025-05-02

“Firehawk Indy 500s As promised, some initial thoughts. These are extremely comfortable. They honestly made it hard to understand how fast I was going because I've come to gauge my speed based on how much I'm being jostled around. I felt almost nothing with these, and there's so much construction on my way to work from the tire place, including a road that hasn't been surfaced properly yet. Perfect testing run for comfort. In terms of performance these bite the road a lot better and it's a lot easier for me to get moving again. Granted, my run flats were almost bald and that's my most recent memory of how they performed, but it's shocking how much I can take a turn or even just accelerate without any risk of sliding or slipping. It feels like a completely different car honestly, and people aren't kidding when they say "just get better tires" on some of these posts asking about mods. It's not as sexy as a new intake, but it makes a much bigger difference. I mean I feel like I was missing out on at least half of my roadster's potential here. So yeah I definitely like them. I don't mean to insult the tire guys' ability to apply tire shine, but I need to redo that disaster when I'm home. I only have detailing spray right now.”

r/Mustang ·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/S2000 ·4 upvotes ·2025-06-04

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”

Top themes
#Value and Pricing#Dry and Wet Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Sidewall Response and Feel#Comparison to Premium Brands

Based on 27 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Advan A050

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Yokohama Advan A050
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available47
Rim diameters16″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″
UTQG340 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Yokohama

Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 81 vs 35 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 84 vs 48 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 85 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 92 vs 83 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.