Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Firestone FR710 vs Michelin Energy MXV4+ — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Firestone FR710 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
47/100
Owner ratings
Dry
77
Wet
68
Snow
52
Comfort
72
Noise
69
Treadwear
70
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Energy MXV4+

All Season Premium Touring tires

Michelin Energy MXV4+ tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
62/100
4 owner reviews
Dry
55
Wet
53
Snow
–
Comfort
98
Noise
–
Treadwear
90
Handling
43

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Firestone FR710 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) FR710 leads by 22
A — Firestone FR710
77
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
55
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
Tire Rack owners 78 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 55
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) FR710 leads by 15
A — Firestone FR710
68
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
53
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
Tire Rack owners 68 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 53
SimpleTire owners 81 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone FR710
52
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
–
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
Tire Rack owners 53 –
SimpleTire owners 74 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Energy MXV4+ leads by 26
A — Firestone FR710
72
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
98
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
Tire Rack owners 72 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 98
SimpleTire owners 84 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone FR710
69
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
–
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Energy MXV4+ leads by 20
A — Firestone FR710
70
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
90
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
Tire Rack owners 70 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 90
SimpleTire owners 79 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) FR710 leads by 34
A — Firestone FR710
77
B — Michelin Energy MXV4+
43
Why this score
SourceFR710Energy MXV4+
Tyre Reviews owners – 43

Scores at a glance

Firestone FR710 vs Michelin Energy MXV4+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone FR710Michelin Energy MXV4+
Relative Score 72 69
Dry 77 55
Wet 68 53
Snow 52 –
Comfort 72 98
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 70 90
Handling 77 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone FR710

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Michelin Energy MXV4+

The Michelin Energy MXV4+ is widely regarded as a comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality. While it is praised by some for its longevity and value as an OEM replacement, others report significant performance limitations, particularly regarding steering feedback and traction in high-temperature or high-speed conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement

Cons

  • Poor steering response and handling precision
  • Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
  • Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
  • Reduced traction in high-temperature environments

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's comfort-focused design is well-suited for mild, daily driving but becomes unsettling on larger or heavier vehicles at speeds exceeding 120km/h.
  • Owners of mid-size sedans, such as the Subaru Legacy, reported a positive experience when using the tire as an upgrade from standard factory equipment.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone FR710 B · Michelin Energy MXV4+
Category—All Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Michelin

Winner: Firestone FR710 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone FR710 scores 77 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 98 vs 72 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone FR710 scores 77 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 90 vs 70 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone FR710
Tire B · Michelin Energy MXV4+

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.