Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs General Altimax Arctic 12 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental WinterContact TS 790

Winter High Performance tires

Continental WinterContact TS 790 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
92
Snow
–
Comfort
86
Noise
–
Treadwear
90
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B General

General Altimax Arctic 12

Premium Touring Winter tire

General Altimax Arctic 12 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
60/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
87/100
56 owner reviews
Dry
45
Wet
61
Snow
74
Comfort
86
Noise
83
Treadwear
86
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental WinterContact TS 790 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 37
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
82
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
45
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
Professional tests (TWG score) – 17
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 82 70
SimpleTire owners – 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 31
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
92
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
61
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
Professional tests (TWG score) – 43
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 92 85
SimpleTire owners – 91

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
–
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
74
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
Professional tests (TWG score) – 59
Tire Rack owners – 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 95
SimpleTire owners – 96

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
86
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
86
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
Professional tests (TWG score) – 86
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 86 70
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
–
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
83
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
SimpleTire owners – 85

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 4
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
90
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
86
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 90 100
SimpleTire owners – 90

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 8
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
88
B — General Altimax Arctic 12
80
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Altimax Arctic 12
Tyre Reviews owners 88 65

Scores at a glance

Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs General Altimax Arctic 12: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 790General Altimax Arctic 12
Relative Score 88 72
Dry 82 45
Wet 92 61
Snow – 74
Comfort 86 86
Noise – 83
Treadwear 90 86
Handling 88 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental WinterContact TS 790

The Continental WinterContact TS 790 is regarded as a reliable and durable winter tire, particularly well-suited for regions with mild winter conditions. Users consistently praise its longevity and wet-weather performance, though its capability in deep snow is viewed as adequate rather than class-leading.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Strong grip and stability in wet conditions
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Consistent performance in mild, slushy, or light snow environments

Cons

  • Limited performance in heavy or deep snow conditions
  • Not optimized for severe winter climates

Observations

  • Demonstrates excellent versatility and reliability on compact city vehicles like the Skoda Citigo
  • Maintains high tread depth even after significant mileage (40,000km)
Tire B General Altimax Arctic 12

The General Altimax Arctic 12 is widely regarded as a high-value, top-tier winter tire that excels in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions. While users note some expected trade-offs in dry pavement handling and increased road noise, the consensus highlights its exceptional longevity and performance-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors.

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow, slush, and ice
  • Exceptional tread life and durability for a winter-specific tire
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands like Nokian or Bridgestone
  • Reliable performance across a diverse range of vehicles, from small sedans to heavy trucks

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in road noise, particularly as the tire wears
  • Softer sidewalls leading to 'squishy' or less precise handling on dry pavement
  • Slightly higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor decrease in fuel economy
  • Reduced grip on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated all-season or summer tires

Observations

  • Drivers of RWD vehicles, such as the BMW Z4, reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain control in harsh winter conditions.
  • Users with light-weight vehicles (e.g., Chevy HHR) and heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Ram, F-150) both report consistent, reliable traction in deep snow.
  • The XL-rated versions provide a robust, beefy sidewall that some users appreciate for sport-tuned suspensions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental WinterContact TS 790 B · General Altimax Arctic 12
CategoryWinter High Performance tiresPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—38
Rim diameters—15″ – 19″
Tread depth—12/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

General

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 790 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 82 vs 45 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 92 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 88 vs 80 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 90 vs 86 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 790
Tire B · General Altimax Arctic 12

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.