86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV vs General Grabber Arctic — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
77/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
86/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber Arctic — better comfort and handling. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 UV if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 UV | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | 92 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 UV | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 94 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winterforce 2 UV leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 UV | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 95 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | 98 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 UV | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | 91 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 UV | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | 87 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winterforce 2 UV leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 UV | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 83 | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 3
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterforce 2 UV | General Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 88 |
| Dry | 87 | 89 |
| Wet | 89 | 91 |
| Snow | 91 | 88 |
| Comfort | 84 | 95 |
| Noise | 80 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 85 |
| Handling | 86 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The General Grabber Arctic is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that offers exceptional traction on snow and ice at a competitive price point. While some users note increased road noise and a slight impact on fuel economy, the consensus highlights its reliability and superior stopping power compared to all-season alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent traction on packed snow, ice, and unplowed surfaces
- Significant improvement in braking performance and vehicle stability
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Effective performance when studded for heavy-duty or commercial plowing applications
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on dry or wet pavement
- Potential for decreased fuel economy
- Some users desire a more aggressive tread pattern for extreme conditions
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (Chevy 2500, F-150) report significant improvements in winter capability, particularly when used for plowing.
- Users note that the tires can be a tight fit on stock rims for certain full-size trucks, though they maintain a good seal in cold temperatures.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV | B · General Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 30 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Firestone
88
/ 100
General
Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better comfort and handling. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 UV if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber Arctic scores 95 vs 84 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV scores 91 vs 88 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber Arctic scores 89 vs 86 on handling.
Tire A · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV also compared with
General Grabber Arctic also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.