89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
265 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
General Grabber A/T vs Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber A/T — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 if snow and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber A/T leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/T | Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Geolander A/T G015 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/T | Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Geolander A/T G015 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/T | Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber A/T leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/T | Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Grabber A/T leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/T | Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber A/T leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/T | Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/T | Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 78 |
| Dry | 95 | 76 |
| Wet | 90 | 93 |
| Snow | 82 | 95 |
| Comfort | 88 | 87 |
| Noise | 86 | – |
| Treadwear | 88 | 63 |
| Handling | 90 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Grabber A/T (specifically the ATX variant) is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-terrain tire that excels in snow, ice, and varied off-road conditions. While most users praise its comfort and quiet road manners, some report concerns regarding tread life, fuel economy, and a tendency for the tread pattern to retain and eject small rocks.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in snow, ice, and winter conditions
- Superior ride comfort and relatively low road noise for an aggressive tread
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors like BFG
- Reliable performance on dirt, gravel, and mud surfaces
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy for many users
- Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing small rocks
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of wet-weather traction issues or 'squirm' when new
Observations
- Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., 2500HD models) report good stability for towing, though proper inflation pressure is critical to avoid a 'floating' sensation.
- Drivers of smaller SUVs and crossovers occasionally report faster tread wear compared to truck applications.
- Low-profile versions on large-diameter rims (20-inch+) are noted by some as having weaker sidewall durability against potholes and curb impacts.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/T | B · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
General
78
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: General Grabber A/T — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 if snow and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber A/T scores 90 vs 53 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/T scores 88 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber A/T scores 95 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 scores 95 vs 82 on snow.
Tire A · General Grabber A/T
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Grabber A/T also compared with
Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.