74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
42 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
94/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
250 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE001 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE001 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE001 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE001 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE001 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE001 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 88 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE001 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 85 |
| Dry | 87 | 88 |
| Wet | 72 | 90 |
| Snow | – | 52 |
| Comfort | 63 | 82 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 79 |
| Handling | 80 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE001 is widely regarded as a high-performance, budget-friendly tire that excels in dry handling and steering responsiveness. While enthusiasts praise its cornering capabilities and value, many users report significant trade-offs in ride comfort and cabin noise, with polarized opinions regarding its wet-weather performance and tread longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and steering feedback
- High value-for-money proposition
- Progressive handling characteristics
- Strong performance for spirited driving and track use
Cons
- High levels of road noise on coarse surfaces
- Stiff, harsh ride quality
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
- Compound hardening over time leading to reduced grip
Observations
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda 2) noted a significant transformation in handling, though at the expense of comfort.
- Users on heavier sedans and performance-oriented vehicles reported varying experiences with tread life, often citing rapid wear under aggressive driving conditions.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong braking performance
- Good rim protection features
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
- Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
- Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 16 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
85
/ 100
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 79 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 88 vs 80 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.