Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Summer Max Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
94/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
250 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
90
Snow
52
Comfort
82
Noise
72
Treadwear
79
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

Summer Max Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
16 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
76
Snow
40
Comfort
76
Noise
53
Treadwear
68
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better noise, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 2
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
86
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Advan Sport ZPS
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 14
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
76
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Advan Sport ZPS
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 12
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
52
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
40

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 6
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
82
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
76
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Advan Sport ZPS
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 57

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 19
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
53
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Advan Sport ZPS
Professional tests (TWG score) 72 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 11
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
68
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Advan Sport ZPS
Tyre Reviews owners 79 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 15
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
73
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Advan Sport ZPS
Tyre Reviews owners 88 73
DriverReviews owners 88 –

Scores at a glance

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
Relative Score 80 68
Dry 88 86
Wet 90 76
Snow 52 40
Comfort 82 76
Noise 72 53
Treadwear 79 68
Handling 88 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Strong braking performance
  • Good rim protection features

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
  • Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
  • Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
  • Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
  • Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

The Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS is a performance-oriented run-flat tire that earns praise for its dry-weather grip, cornering stability, and value when purchased as discounted 'new old stock.' However, the consensus is heavily polarized by significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear, harsh ride quality, and inconsistent performance in cold or wet conditions.

Pros

  • Strong dry-weather traction and cornering stability
  • High value proposition when purchased at clearance or discounted pricing
  • Effective run-flat capability for daily drivers
  • Improved acceleration and handling compared to some OEM alternatives

Cons

  • Extremely short tread life and premature wear
  • Harsh and noisy ride quality
  • Poor performance and lack of grip in cold or wet conditions
  • Stiff sidewalls can lead to a numb steering feel

Observations

  • Users with high-torque electric vehicles noted better rear-tire longevity compared to previous Pirelli sets.
  • Drivers of performance coupes and MINIs appreciate the ZPS run-flat technology for daily commuting, despite the inherent trade-off in ride comfort.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available162
Rim diameters18″ – 21″16″ – 18″
Tread depth7 - 9/32″10/32″
UTQG300 - 500 A - AA A180 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear

Yokohama

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better noise, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 72 vs 53 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 88 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 76 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 52 vs 40 on snow.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.