77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE01R vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
151 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE01R | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE01R | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 87 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE01R | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE01R leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE01R | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE01R leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE01R | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE01R | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 81 |
| Dry | 90 | 90 |
| Wet | 83 | 87 |
| Comfort | 60 | 81 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 71 |
| Handling | 80 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE01R is highly regarded as a high-performance tire that bridges the gap between street and track use. Users consistently praise its exceptional grip levels, predictable handling, and robust sidewall construction, making it a favorite for spirited driving and track-day enthusiasts.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Predictable and communicative breakaway behavior
- High durability and heat resistance during track sessions
- Stiff sidewall construction providing precise steering feedback
Cons
- High price point compared to competitors
- Limited market availability and difficulty in sourcing
- Performance may be surpassed by dedicated R-compound tires for pure track use
Observations
- Users noted that the tire provides almost excessive grip for lower-horsepower, lightweight platforms like the Honda Integra.
- Performance remains consistent and durable even when subjected to heavy track-day usage on high-performance vehicles like the BMW M3.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet-weather traction and provides a significant comfort upgrade over many OEM run-flat or performance alternatives. While the majority of users praise its confidence-inspiring grip and handling, a subset of owners reports inconsistent tread life and occasional issues with road noise or tramlining as the tires wear down.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of dry-road traction and cornering stability
- Superior ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to OEM run-flats
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Inconsistent tread longevity, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Increased road noise on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Tendency to tramline or become vague as tread depth decreases
- Poor performance and lack of grip in near-freezing or snowy conditions
Observations
- BMW and other performance vehicle owners frequently report that switching from OEM run-flat tires to these Goodyears significantly improves ride quality and steering feedback.
- Users with high-torque or rear-wheel-drive vehicles noted that while grip is excellent, aggressive driving styles can lead to faster-than-expected rear tire wear.
- Some owners of larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) reported higher susceptibility to road noise and vibration compared to smaller diameter fitments.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE01R | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 - 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Bridgestone
81
/ 100
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 81 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 87 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE01R
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE01R also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.