Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Summer Max Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
151 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
87
Comfort
81
Noise
–
Treadwear
71
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 3 if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric leads by 3
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
87
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
90
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric leads by 8
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
79
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
87
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Tire Rack owners 78 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 87

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric leads by 6
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
75
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
81
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Tire Rack owners 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
71
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric leads by 9
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
62
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
71
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Tire Rack owners 62 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 3 leads by 7
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
85
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
78
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Tyre Reviews owners – 78

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 3Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Relative Score 76 81
Dry 87 90
Wet 79 87
Comfort 75 81
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 62 71
Handling 85 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiSportContact 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet-weather traction and provides a significant comfort upgrade over many OEM run-flat or performance alternatives. While the majority of users praise its confidence-inspiring grip and handling, a subset of owners reports inconsistent tread life and occasional issues with road noise or tramlining as the tires wear down.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of dry-road traction and cornering stability
  • Superior ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to OEM run-flats
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread longevity, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Increased road noise on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
  • Tendency to tramline or become vague as tread depth decreases
  • Poor performance and lack of grip in near-freezing or snowy conditions

Observations

  • BMW and other performance vehicle owners frequently report that switching from OEM run-flat tires to these Goodyears significantly improves ride quality and steering feedback.
  • Users with high-torque or rear-wheel-drive vehicles noted that while grip is excellent, aggressive driving styles can lead to faster-than-expected rear tire wear.
  • Some owners of larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) reported higher susceptibility to road noise and vibration compared to smaller diameter fitments.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Category—Summer Max Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″8 - 10/32″
UTQG280 A - B A240 - 300 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 3 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 87 vs 79 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiSportContact 3 scores 85 vs 78 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 81 vs 75 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 3
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.