67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Optimo H426 vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Optimo H426 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Optimo H426 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Optimo H426 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 25 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Optimo H426 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 56 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Optimo H426 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 47 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Optimo H426 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H426 | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 79 |
| Dry | 80 | 83 |
| Wet | 74 | 83 |
| Snow | 21 | – |
| Comfort | 58 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 77 |
| Handling | 63 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Optimo H426 presents a polarizing experience, often serving as an OEM tire that provides competent dry and wet traction for daily commuting. While some users appreciate its initial comfort and handling capabilities, the consensus is heavily impacted by concerns regarding premature tread wear and inconsistent noise levels over the life of the tire.
Pros
- Reliable grip and handling on dry pavement
- Confident performance in wet weather conditions
- Initial comfort and quietness when new
Cons
- Short tread life and premature wear
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- High price point relative to performance value
- Uneven wear patterns across front and rear axles
Observations
- Users reported significantly faster wear on front-wheel-drive vehicles, leading to uneven tread depletion compared to rear tires.
- Drivers of compact sedans noted that while the tire offers decent handling, it fails to maintain its initial noise-dampening qualities over time.
The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
- Reliable dry handling performance
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Observations
- Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
- Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H426 | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Hankook
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 83 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 77 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 83 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 67 vs 58 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H426
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Optimo H426 also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.