Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 89 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 60 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 65 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 80 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 79 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Multihawk 2 | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 80 |
| Dry | 82 | 88 |
| Wet | 52 | 83 |
| Comfort | 64 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 80 |
| Handling | 75 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #12/14 · 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 | 13% #8/18 · 2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tyre Test | -4.2 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Multihawk 2 is generally regarded as a budget-friendly, dry-weather performer that offers good comfort and low noise levels. However, it receives significant criticism for its performance in wet conditions, with multiple users reporting dangerous levels of traction loss and unpredictable handling during rain.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High levels of ride comfort
- Low road noise
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and tendency to slide on wet surfaces
- Lack of audible feedback when reaching the limit of grip
- Concerns regarding tread wear longevity
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on climate, with dry-weather satisfaction being high in arid regions.
- Drivers reported significant rear-end instability when the tires were fitted to the rear axle in wet conditions.
The Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers a comfortable, quiet ride for daily commuting. While it is frequently praised for its competitive pricing and balanced performance, some users report inconsistent wet-weather confidence and accelerated tread wear when subjected to heavier vehicle loads or aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption
- Predictable and stable handling for touring applications
Cons
- Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
- Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
- Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
- Sidewall durability concerns, including reports of cracking
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., MPVs like the Sharan or SUVs) report significantly faster tread wear and reduced longevity.
- Drivers noted that the tire performs best as a comfort-oriented touring tire, with some users finding it less responsive or 'dull' on smaller 16-inch rim sizes compared to 17-inch variants.
- Performance is highly sensitive to tread depth; wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance drop off noticeably once the tire reaches the 3-4mm wear mark.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Multihawk 2 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 83 vs 52 on wet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 80 vs 52 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 88 vs 82 on dry.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 68 vs 64 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.