78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Hankook Ventus ST — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
87/100
46 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus ST — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if noise and snow matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 89 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 95 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 51 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 91 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 84 |
| Dry | 88 | 86 |
| Wet | 83 | 91 |
| Snow | 81 | 76 |
| Comfort | 83 | 86 |
| Noise | 80 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 89 |
| Handling | 74 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Hankook Ventus ST is widely regarded as a high-value, durable tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in both longevity and road noise. While the vast majority of users report excellent dry and wet traction on heavy SUVs and performance trucks, a small minority of users experienced issues with wet-weather handling and road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors
- Low road noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong dry and wet traction for heavy, high-torque vehicles
- High value-for-money proposition
- Consistent performance across a wide range of SUV and truck applications
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
- Potential for reduced wet-weather feedback or 'skating' in heavy standing water
- Inconsistent availability across different retail markets
- Some reports of hard ride quality if tire pressure is not properly managed
Observations
- Users with high-torque, heavy SUVs (e.g., Jeep Grand Cherokee, Range Rover) consistently report superior longevity compared to Pirelli or Continental alternatives.
- Owners of high-performance trucks (e.g., F-150, Dodge Charger) note improved stability and reduced rear-end spin compared to factory-fitted tires.
- Drivers running 22-inch low-profile configurations report surprisingly good comfort levels despite the reduced sidewall.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
84
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus ST — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if noise and snow matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus ST scores 89 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 80 vs 67 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus ST scores 84 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus ST scores 91 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Hankook Ventus ST
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Hankook Ventus ST also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.