86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
87/100
46 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Ventus ST vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus ST — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 95 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 69 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 51 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus ST leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Ventus ST | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus ST | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 63 |
| Dry | 86 | 75 |
| Wet | 91 | 55 |
| Snow | 76 | 50 |
| Comfort | 86 | 70 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | 64 |
| Handling | 84 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
63
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus ST is widely regarded as a high-value, durable tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in both longevity and road noise. While the vast majority of users report excellent dry and wet traction on heavy SUVs and performance trucks, a small minority of users experienced issues with wet-weather handling and road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors
- Low road noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong dry and wet traction for heavy, high-torque vehicles
- High value-for-money proposition
- Consistent performance across a wide range of SUV and truck applications
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
- Potential for reduced wet-weather feedback or 'skating' in heavy standing water
- Inconsistent availability across different retail markets
- Some reports of hard ride quality if tire pressure is not properly managed
Observations
- Users with high-torque, heavy SUVs (e.g., Jeep Grand Cherokee, Range Rover) consistently report superior longevity compared to Pirelli or Continental alternatives.
- Owners of high-performance trucks (e.g., F-150, Dodge Charger) note improved stability and reduced rear-end spin compared to factory-fitted tires.
- Drivers running 22-inch low-profile configurations report surprisingly good comfort levels despite the reduced sidewall.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus ST | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Hankook
63
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Hankook Ventus ST — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus ST scores 91 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Ventus ST scores 76 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus ST scores 89 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus ST scores 84 vs 67 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus ST
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus ST also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.