89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Defender T+H vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender T+H — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 69 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender T+H | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 63 |
| Dry | 94 | 75 |
| Wet | 91 | 55 |
| Snow | 76 | 50 |
| Comfort | 89 | 70 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 90 | 64 |
| Handling | 92 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
63
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender T+H | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Michelin
63
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 91 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Defender T+H scores 76 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 90 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender T+H scores 92 vs 67 on handling.
Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Defender T+H also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.