63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 52 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 89 |
| Dry | 75 | 95 |
| Wet | 55 | 93 |
| Snow | 50 | 85 |
| Comfort | 70 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 90 |
| Handling | 67 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Michelin
89
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 85 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.