65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — better wet and snow. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver A/S if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 Plus leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 74 | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 Plus leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 54 | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 Plus leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 69 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 63 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 66 | 55 |
| Snow | 60 | 50 |
| Comfort | 71 | 70 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | 64 |
| Handling | 55 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
63
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus is a polarizing tire that excels in fuel efficiency and initial comfort but frequently disappoints users regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance. While many owners appreciate its low rolling resistance and quiet ride when new, a significant portion of the user base reports premature wear and a noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy due to low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and noise suppression when new
- Predictable handling for daily commuting and highway driving
- Good dry traction for standard, non-spirited driving
Cons
- Significant premature tread wear failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Increased road noise and vibration as the tire wears
- Lack of grip during spirited driving or in heavy rain
Observations
- SUV and Crossover owners (e.g., Mazda CX-9, Subaru Forester) frequently report that the tire's sidewall stiffness and grip limits are insufficient for the vehicle's weight and handling characteristics.
- Users of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Jetta, Toyota Yaris) tend to report higher satisfaction with comfort and noise levels compared to those driving larger SUVs.
- Multiple reports indicate that the tire's performance degrades significantly after the first 20,000–30,000 miles, particularly regarding noise and vibration.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Bridgestone
63
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — better wet and snow. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver A/S if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 67 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 66 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 60 vs 50 on snow.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.