Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus Z214 vs Yokohama A022 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus Z214

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Hankook Ventus Z214 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
1 owner review
Dry
100
Wet
–
Comfort
50
Treadwear
70
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama A022

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Yokohama A022 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
1 owner review
Dry
90
Wet
80
Comfort
90
Treadwear
100
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama A022 — better comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus Z214 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Z214 leads by 10
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
100
B — Yokohama A022
90
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214A022
Tyre Reviews owners 100 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
–
B — Yokohama A022
80
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214A022
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A022 leads by 40
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
50
B — Yokohama A022
90
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214A022
Tyre Reviews owners 50 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A022 leads by 30
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
70
B — Yokohama A022
100
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214A022
Tyre Reviews owners 70 100

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
90
B — Yokohama A022
90
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214A022
Tyre Reviews owners 90 90

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus Z214 vs Yokohama A022: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Z214Yokohama A022
Relative Score 76 94
Dry 100 90
Wet – 80
Comfort 50 90
Treadwear 70 100
Handling 90 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus Z214

The Hankook Ventus Z214 is highly regarded as a dedicated track tire that offers exceptional grip and rapid warm-up times. Users emphasize that performance is heavily dependent on proper heat cycling and precise pressure management to maximize both longevity and traction.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry track grip
  • Rapid warm-up to operating temperature
  • High value for the price point
  • Surprisingly capable on damp track surfaces

Cons

  • Requires strict adherence to break-in procedures
  • Performance and longevity are highly sensitive to pressure management
  • Requires a 24-hour cooling period after initial heat cycling

Observations

  • Performance is optimized for dedicated track use rather than street driving.
  • Users note that the soft compound variant requires careful management to balance grip with tire life.
Tire B Yokohama A022

The Yokohama A022 is highly regarded by owners for its exceptional grip and handling characteristics, particularly in spirited driving scenarios. Users report impressive longevity and surprising versatility, noting reliable performance even in adverse weather conditions like snow and ice.

Pros

  • Exceptional cornering grip and traction under acceleration
  • Impressive tread life, with reports of over 34,000 miles
  • Surprising capability and reassurance in winter conditions
  • High level of driver confidence and feedback

Cons

  • Discontinued production status makes finding replacements difficult
  • Limited availability in the current market

Observations

  • Highly praised for its performance synergy with the Toyota MR2 platform
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Z214 B · Yokohama A022
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama A022 — better comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus Z214 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A022 scores 90 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama A022 scores 100 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Z214 scores 100 vs 90 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Z214
Tire B · Yokohama A022

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.