75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho 758 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
36 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho 758 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE50 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | 758 | BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE50 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | 758 | BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 67 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE50 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | 758 | BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | 758 | BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
758 leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | 758 | BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
758 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | 758 | BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 69 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho 758 | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 68 |
| Dry | 63 | 74 |
| Wet | 70 | 72 |
| Comfort | 65 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 95 | 60 |
| Handling | 73 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
68
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho 758 is generally regarded as a reliable, long-lasting tire that provides competent handling and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions. While it earns praise for its durability and water drainage capabilities, some users report significant compromises in ride comfort and cabin noise levels.
Pros
- Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
- Excellent water drainage
- Exceptional tread longevity
- Reliable overall road manners
Cons
- Noticeable road noise
- Subpar ride comfort
- Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement
Observations
- Users consistently highlight the tire's durability, suggesting it is well-suited for high-mileage drivers who prioritize longevity over ride quality.
The Yokohama BluEarth AE50 presents a polarizing experience for drivers, with user feedback sharply divided between those praising its comfort and wet-weather confidence and those frustrated by rapid tread wear and inconsistent noise levels. While many value it as a cost-effective, daily-driving tire, others report significant dissatisfaction regarding its longevity and performance degradation over time.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
- Noticeable fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, with some users reporting aquaplaning
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or FWD configurations frequently reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks noted that while the tire offers good daily comfort, it lacks the structural rigidity required for aggressive cornering.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho 758 | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Kumho
68
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Kumho 758 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho 758 scores 95 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 74 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho 758 scores 73 vs 69 on handling.
Tire A · Kumho 758
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho 758 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.