Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
186 owner reviews
Dry
96
Wet
92
Snow
87
Comfort
94
Noise
91
Treadwear
93
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Crugen HP71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
31 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
79
Snow
75
Comfort
78
Noise
75
Treadwear
68
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, comfort and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 14
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
96
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
82
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 89 50
SimpleTire owners – 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 13
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
92
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
79
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 78 45
SimpleTire owners – 80

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 12
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
87
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
75
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
Tire Rack owners – 72
Tyre Reviews owners 43 –
SimpleTire owners – 74

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 16
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
94
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
78
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 88 65
SimpleTire owners – 78

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 16
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
91
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
75
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
SimpleTire owners – 75

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 25
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
93
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
68
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
Tire Rack owners – 76
Tyre Reviews owners 86 55
SimpleTire owners – 65

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 5
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
75
B — Kumho Crugen HP71
70
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HP71
Tyre Reviews owners 75 70
DriverReviews owners – 76

Scores at a glance

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Kumho Crugen HP71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 90 75
Dry 96 82
Wet 92 79
Snow 87 75
Comfort 94 78
Noise 91 75
Treadwear 93 68
Handling 75 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

The Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is widely regarded as a high-value, durable all-terrain tire that excels in longevity and on-road comfort. While most users praise its quiet highway performance and reliable traction across varied conditions, a subset of owners reports inconsistent wet-weather grip and concerns regarding sidewall durability.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
  • Reliable dry-road handling and off-road capability in mud and gravel

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
  • Stiff ride quality, particularly in higher load-range ratings

Observations

  • Heavy-duty truck owners (2500HD models) reported significant trailer sway and instability when towing, suggesting the tire sidewalls may be too flexible for heavy-duty towing applications.
  • Users with larger, oversized tire configurations (e.g., 35-inch) noted that the tires maintain surprisingly low noise levels even at high highway speeds.
  • Owners of light-to-mid-sized SUVs and pickups consistently report the best balance of comfort and performance.
Tire B Kumho Crugen HP71

The Kumho Crugen HP71 presents a polarized user experience, often serving as a budget-friendly alternative to premium OEM tires. While many owners praise its wet-weather traction, quiet ride, and value proposition, a significant segment of users reports severe issues with premature tread wear, road noise, and balancing difficulties.

Pros

  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for many users
  • Good initial handling and steering response

Cons

  • Significant reports of premature tread wear and short lifespan
  • Development of excessive road noise or 'howling' over time
  • Persistent balancing and vibration issues
  • Inconsistent quality control regarding structural integrity

Observations

  • Users with heavier SUVs and EVs (e.g., Kia EV6, Mercedes GLE) report faster-than-expected tread degradation.
  • Some owners of larger SUVs (e.g., Jeep Grand Cherokee) noted significant difficulty in maintaining proper tire balance.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinion on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including its EV variant) is mixed. Many users appreciate its affordability, smooth ride comfort, and quietness when new, particularly as an OEM or budget-friendly alternative. However, a notable number of drivers report rapid tread wear on factory installations, noise issues over rough pavement, and occasional durability concerns with internal acoustic foam separation.

r/volvoc40 ·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08

“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”

r/VWiD4Owners ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”

r/KiaEV6 ·2 upvotes ·2026-07-31

“Tire wear on original 2024 KUMHO Grugen HP71 EV Full disclosure - I drive like a hyper-miling grandmother, always in ECO mode. Leased this Wind RWD 2 years ago. Original tires read: KUMHO Grugen HP71 EV 235/55 R19 101H Treadwear 500. Traction A Temperature A. Southern California. At 12k miles my tires have 3/32 tread left. These tires if purchased have a 60k or so tread wear warranty - which does not apply to tires "originally equipped". I did not check these tires when car was new. Has anyone experienced this ?”

r/KiaEV6 ·2 upvotes ·2023-06-08

“Tire troubles - 19" Kumho Crugen HP71 I have a US spec 2022 Wind AWD with 23,000 miles on these Kumho tires. In my less than 9 months of ownership I've had two tires patched from slow leaks and I just had to have the foam lining removed from a tire since it separated from the inner tire wall and created massive vibrations in the steering wheel. With one of the patches my local shop pulled a stone that was less than 1/4" from the tread where it punctured the tire. Yes, it was pointy and sharp but also comically tiny. I'm I just extra special lucky or are others having issues with these tires? I really hope there are more options for our vehicles when it comes time to replace these.”

Top themes
#Tread wear and longevity#Ride comfort and quietness#EV variant performance#Value and pricing#Factory OEM performance#Acoustic foam issues

Based on 30 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available456
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″9.9/32″
UTQG560 A B640 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, comfort and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 93 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 94 vs 78 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 91 vs 75 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 96 vs 82 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.