86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
31 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 vs Nexen N Priz RH1 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
46 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Priz RH1 if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 65 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 12
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N Priz RH1 leads by 5
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 | Nexen N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 81 |
| Dry | 94 | 90 |
| Wet | 90 | 82 |
| Snow | 85 | 73 |
| Comfort | 90 | 88 |
| Noise | 84 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 78 |
| Handling | 70 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that delivers balanced performance across dry, wet, and light winter conditions. While it may not lead its class in any single performance metric, users consistently praise its affordability and reliability, making it a popular choice for daily drivers seeking a cost-effective alternative to premium brands.
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Responsive handling and cornering stability
- Surprisingly capable performance in light snow conditions
Cons
- Road noise can increase as the tire wears
- Some users find them louder than premium OEM alternatives
- Ride comfort is adequate but may not fully absorb road imperfections for all drivers
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles like the Chevy Spark and Toyota Corolla report improved handling and rim protection compared to factory-installed tires.
- Owners of higher-horsepower vehicles, such as the Cadillac CTS-V, find the tire to be a capable and economical daily-driving option, though it is not marketed as a dedicated performance tire.
The Nexen N Priz RH1 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that excels in ride comfort and low road noise. While many users report satisfactory performance in dry and wet conditions, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and durability, with some users experiencing premature wear or sidewall issues.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Reliable dry and wet traction for daily commuting
- Aesthetically pleasing, particularly the whitewall options
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting wear-out under 25,000 miles
- Soft sidewalls that may not be suitable for heavy towing or aggressive driving
- Reports of durability issues, including sidewall bulges and punctures
- Mixed feedback on wet-weather confidence
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles and classic cars report high satisfaction with ride comfort and handling.
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as full-size SUVs and trucks, noted that the soft sidewalls can feel unstable under load or when towing.
- Performance on SUVs is generally rated as comfortable, though some OEM-equipped users expressed concerns regarding wet-road feedback.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 | B · Nexen N Priz RH1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Kumho
81
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Priz RH1 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 85 vs 73 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 90 vs 82 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 85 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Priz RH1 scores 89 vs 84 on noise.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22
Tire B · Nexen N Priz RH1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 also compared with
Nexen N Priz RH1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.