86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
31 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 43 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 61 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 4X KU22 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta 4X KU22 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 64 |
| Dry | 94 | 75 |
| Wet | 90 | 64 |
| Snow | 85 | 44 |
| Comfort | 90 | 74 |
| Noise | 84 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 63 |
| Handling | 70 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that delivers balanced performance across dry, wet, and light winter conditions. While it may not lead its class in any single performance metric, users consistently praise its affordability and reliability, making it a popular choice for daily drivers seeking a cost-effective alternative to premium brands.
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Responsive handling and cornering stability
- Surprisingly capable performance in light snow conditions
Cons
- Road noise can increase as the tire wears
- Some users find them louder than premium OEM alternatives
- Ride comfort is adequate but may not fully absorb road imperfections for all drivers
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles like the Chevy Spark and Toyota Corolla report improved handling and rim protection compared to factory-installed tires.
- Owners of higher-horsepower vehicles, such as the Cadillac CTS-V, find the tire to be a capable and economical daily-driving option, though it is not marketed as a dedicated performance tire.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 19 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Kumho
64
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 85 vs 44 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 90 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 85 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 scores 94 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 also compared with
Kumho Solus TA31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.