71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Kumho Ecsta KH11 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 and Kumho Ecsta KH11 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 is stronger on comfort and dry. Kumho Ecsta KH11 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 64 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 66 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Kumho Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 72 |
| Dry | 76 | 72 |
| Wet | 62 | 64 |
| Comfort | 80 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 83 |
| Handling | 61 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
The Kumho Ecsta KH11 presents a polarized user experience, with feedback ranging from high praise for longevity and value to significant criticism regarding handling and wet-weather performance. While some drivers report exceptional tread life and reliable grip, others express concerns over sidewall stability and inconsistent performance, particularly on performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High value-for-money compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry and wet road traction for daily commuting
- Consistent fuel economy
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
- Inconsistent grip levels in wet conditions
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Lack of confidence during spirited driving
Observations
- Users driving heavier executive sedans reported high satisfaction with long-distance comfort and tread life.
- Performance-oriented vehicle owners noted significant dissatisfaction with sidewall stiffness and handling precision.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | B · Kumho Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Kumho
72
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 and Kumho Ecsta KH11 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 is stronger on comfort and dry. Kumho Ecsta KH11 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 80 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta KH11 scores 83 vs 77 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta KH11 scores 66 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 76 vs 72 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KH11
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KH11 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.