72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta KH11 vs Riken All Star 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
56
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta KH11 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
All Star 2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KH11 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 73 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KH11 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 57 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KH11 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 46
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KH11 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 37 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KH11 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KH11 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta KH11 | Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 56 |
| Dry | 72 | 73 |
| Wet | 64 | 57 |
| Comfort | 73 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 37 |
| Handling | 66 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
56
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta KH11 presents a polarized user experience, with feedback ranging from high praise for longevity and value to significant criticism regarding handling and wet-weather performance. While some drivers report exceptional tread life and reliable grip, others express concerns over sidewall stability and inconsistent performance, particularly on performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High value-for-money compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry and wet road traction for daily commuting
- Consistent fuel economy
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
- Inconsistent grip levels in wet conditions
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Lack of confidence during spirited driving
Observations
- Users driving heavier executive sedans reported high satisfaction with long-distance comfort and tread life.
- Performance-oriented vehicle owners noted significant dissatisfaction with sidewall stiffness and handling precision.
The Riken All Star 2 is viewed as a polarizing budget-tier tire that serves as a temporary solution rather than a long-term investment. While some users appreciate its value proposition for light-duty city driving, others report significant concerns regarding premature wear and overall durability compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Attractive low price point
- Acceptable noise levels for budget-conscious drivers
- Adequate stopping performance in light city conditions
Cons
- Poor tread longevity and durability
- Failure to meet safety inspection standards within a year
- Inconsistent quality compared to premium tire brands
Observations
- Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daewoo Matiz reported acceptable noise levels and curb-climbing capability.
- The tire is frequently criticized when used as a direct replacement for higher-end performance tires, highlighting a significant gap in material longevity.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta KH11 | B · Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Kumho
56
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Kumho Ecsta KH11 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta KH11 scores 83 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta KH11 scores 64 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta KH11 scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta KH11 scores 66 vs 60 on handling.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta KH11
Tire B · Riken All Star 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KH11 also compared with
Riken All Star 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.