Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25

All Season High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
66
Snow
–
Comfort
49
Noise
–
Treadwear
71
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
81
Snow
79
Comfort
83
Noise
89
Treadwear
81
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 3
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
83
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
86
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 85
Tyre Reviews owners 83 83
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 15
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
66
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 66 78
SimpleTire owners – 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
–
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
SimpleTire owners – 79

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 34
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
49
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
83
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 49 78
SimpleTire owners – 89

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
–
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
89
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
SimpleTire owners – 89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 10
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
71
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 71 75
SimpleTire owners – 88

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 14
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
65
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Ecsta PS31
Tyre Reviews owners 65 79

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta AST KU25Kumho Ecsta PS31
Relative Score 67 82
Dry 83 86
Wet 66 81
Snow – 79
Comfort 49 83
Noise – 89
Treadwear 71 81
Handling 65 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta AST KU25

The Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 is generally regarded as an affordable, entry-level tire suitable for daily commuting rather than performance-oriented driving. While users appreciate its dry-weather grip and aesthetic tread pattern, the tire is frequently criticized for significant road noise and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.

Pros

  • Attractive and aggressive tread design
  • Strong dry-weather traction and handling
  • High value-to-price ratio
  • Satisfactory tread longevity for daily driving

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Unpredictable and poor wet-weather performance
  • Abrupt loss of grip when pushed to limits
  • Not suitable for spirited or performance driving

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback, which some drivers appreciate for daily handling.
  • Performance characteristics are highly polarized, with some users reporting confidence in heavy rain while others report dangerous instability.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta PS31

The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
  • Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
  • Increased noise levels as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
  • Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 B · Kumho Ecsta PS31
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—17″ – 18″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 83 vs 49 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 71 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.