Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 258 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: Ecsta PS31 and Ecsta Sport PS72 are level at 83.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 8 tests Owners 94 · 542 reviews
“Kumho ecsta sport S. Huge improvement Just finished off the stock Michelin Pilot sport 4 street tires. They were so darn loud. I had my track tires on and they were significantly quieter than the PS4 tires. So I decided to switch to the Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) in a 225/40/18 Immediately noticed a slightly more compliant ride (taller sidewall is the cause?) and much quieter even on crosshatch concrete. They’re relatively cheap at $160 per tire. Treadwear is much lower at 240 so I’ll see how long they last.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
86
Dry
Ecsta PS31 +185Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 86 91 -
81
Wet
Ecsta Sport PS72 +687Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) – 86 Reviews found online 81 88 -
79
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online 79 – -
83
Comfort
Ecsta PS31 +479Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 83 75 -
89
Noise
Ecsta PS31 +2069Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) – 69 Reviews found online 89 – -
81
Treadwear
Ecsta Sport PS72 +485Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online 81 85 -
79
Handling
Ecsta Sport PS72 +887Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online 79 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS31 | Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 83 |
| Dry | 86 | 85 |
| Wet | 81 | 87 |
| Snow | 79 | – |
| Comfort | 83 | 79 |
| Noise | 89 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 85 |
| Handling | 79 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Ecsta PS31
Ecsta Sport PS72
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PS31
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
Tire B Ecsta Sport PS72
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip with short braking distances
- High value for money compared to Tier-1 premium brands
- Stable, predictable handling and confident cornering
Cons
- Reported instances of out-of-round tires causing high-speed steering vibrations
- Occasional complaints about increased road noise on certain rough surfaces
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users during aggressive, spirited driving
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta PS31
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 (and its 'Sport S' variant) is overwhelmingly positive, with many users praising its exceptional value, low noise levels, and impressive dry and wet grip that rivals premium tier brands like Michelin. While a few note potential drawbacks such as a lack of rim protection or varied longevity expectations, the general consensus is that these tires punch significantly above their weight class for the price.
“New summer tires A while ago, I made a post during my search for a new set of summer tires. In the end, I chose the Kumho PS72 Ecsta Sport S. My previous tires included the Michelin PS4S, Bridgestone Turanza T005, Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3, and Toyo Proxes Sport 2. With the Michelins being my favorite in terms of driving feel. By now, I’ve driven around 1,000 km on the Kumhos, and I’m pleasantly surprised. They offer excellent grip on dry roads and in corners, and they still perform well in wet conditions. My car has over 300 hp and AWD, so grip is definitely important. I can highly recommend these tires, especially considering the price. In terms of feel and performance, they don’t seem to fall short of the Michelin PS4S I had before, yet they cost me about half as much.”
“Thoroughly delighted with the new Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) 500 miles ago I swapped out my “winter” (Pirelli WeatherActives) set for these Kumhos and I have been extremely satisfied with performance, cornering, and especially ride comfort and quietness. Mind you, this is the Ecsta Sport S, which is above the Ecsta Sport A/S and Sport in terms of sportiness. The price was also a delight, at just a hair above US$1,000 including labor. Car is a 2013 Audi Q5 with the supercharged 3.0 V6 running 20x9 Porsche Macan wheels. Read more”
“Kumho Sport PS72 (225/40/18) Absolutely in love with these tyres so far! I’ve currently only done about 150 miles in the warm UK weather, the dry grip is unbelievable & it feels so responsive. I moved from Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6’s to these, so you’d probably consider it a ‘downgrade’ however from what I’ve felt so far it feels great, we’re getting heavy rain over the next 5/6 days so I’ll be able to test the wet grip & braking so I’ll report back for that. One massive downside… the severe lack of Rim protection (as seen in the photos) if you regularly parking near kerbs or you’re a woman this is not ideal.”
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 | B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 4 | 37 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9.4/32″ |
| UTQG | 460 A A | 320 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PS31
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta PS31 and Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta PS31 is stronger on noise and comfort. Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is stronger on handling, wet and treadwear.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 89 vs 69 on noise.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 87 vs 79 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 87 vs 81 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 83 vs 79 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews found online. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.