Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: Ecsta Sport PS72 and N Fera SU4 are level at 85.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 85 · 8 tests Owners 94 · 542 reviews

“Kumho ecsta sport S. Huge improvement Just finished off the stock Michelin Pilot sport 4 street tires. They were so darn loud. I had my track tires on and they were significantly quieter than the PS4 tires. So I decided to switch to the Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) in a 225/40/18 Immediately noticed a slightly more compliant ride (taller sidewall is the cause?) and much quieter even on crosshatch concrete. They’re relatively cheap at $160 per tire. Treadwear is much lower at 240 so I’ll see how long they last.”

Tire BNexen

N Fera SU4

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 85 · 79 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 85

    Dry

    N Fera SU4 +6
    91
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score)82–
    Reviews found online9191
  2. 87

    Wet

    Level
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score)86–
    Reviews found online8887
  3. 79

    Comfort

    N Fera SU4 +8
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score)82–
    Reviews found online7587
  4. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score)69–
  5. 85

    Treadwear

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +4
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72N Fera SU4
    Reviews found online8581
  6. 87

    Handling

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +7
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72N Fera SU4
    Reviews found online8780
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Nexen N Fera SU4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta Sport PS72Nexen N Fera SU4
Relative Score 85 85
Dry 85 91
Wet 87 87
Comfort 79 87
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 85 81
Handling 87 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta Sport PS72

N Fera SU4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta Sport PS72

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip with short braking distances
  • High value for money compared to Tier-1 premium brands
  • Stable, predictable handling and confident cornering

Cons

  • Reported instances of out-of-round tires causing high-speed steering vibrations
  • Occasional complaints about increased road noise on certain rough surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users during aggressive, spirited driving
All owner themes in the Ecsta Sport PS72 review

Tire B N Fera SU4

Pros

  • Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
  • Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
  • Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
All owner themes in the N Fera SU4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Positive

Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 (and its 'Sport S' variant) is overwhelmingly positive, with many users praising its exceptional value, low noise levels, and impressive dry and wet grip that rivals premium tier brands like Michelin. While a few note potential drawbacks such as a lack of rim protection or varied longevity expectations, the general consensus is that these tires punch significantly above their weight class for the price.

r/TyreReviews ·73 upvotes ·2026-04-04

“New summer tires A while ago, I made a post during my search for a new set of summer tires. In the end, I chose the Kumho PS72 Ecsta Sport S. My previous tires included the Michelin PS4S, Bridgestone Turanza T005, Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3, and Toyo Proxes Sport 2. With the Michelins being my favorite in terms of driving feel. By now, I’ve driven around 1,000 km on the Kumhos, and I’m pleasantly surprised. They offer excellent grip on dry roads and in corners, and they still perform well in wet conditions. My car has over 300 hp and AWD, so grip is definitely important. I can highly recommend these tires, especially considering the price. In terms of feel and performance, they don’t seem to fall short of the Michelin PS4S I had before, yet they cost me about half as much.”

r/TyreReviews ·57 upvotes ·2025-06-21

“Thoroughly delighted with the new Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) 500 miles ago I swapped out my “winter” (Pirelli WeatherActives) set for these Kumhos and I have been extremely satisfied with performance, cornering, and especially ride comfort and quietness. Mind you, this is the Ecsta Sport S, which is above the Ecsta Sport A/S and Sport in terms of sportiness. The price was also a delight, at just a hair above US$1,000 including labor. Car is a 2013 Audi Q5 with the supercharged 3.0 V6 running 20x9 Porsche Macan wheels. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·38 upvotes ·2026-05-31

“Kumho Sport PS72 (225/40/18) Absolutely in love with these tyres so far! I’ve currently only done about 150 miles in the warm UK weather, the dry grip is unbelievable & it feels so responsive. I moved from Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6’s to these, so you’d probably consider it a ‘downgrade’ however from what I’ve felt so far it feels great, we’re getting heavy rain over the next 5/6 days so I’ll be able to test the wet grip & braking so I’ll report back for that. One massive downside… the severe lack of Rim protection (as seen in the photos) if you regularly parking near kerbs or you’re a woman this is not ideal.”

Top themes
#Dry and wet grip#Price and value#Ride comfort and noise#Comparison to Michelin#Handling and steering feel#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 29 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Fera SU4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 B · Nexen N Fera SU4
Category—Summer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available37—
Rim diameters17″ – 21″—
Tread depth9.4/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Nexen N Fera SU4

Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 and Nexen N Fera SU4 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is stronger on handling and treadwear. Nexen N Fera SU4 is stronger on comfort and dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 79 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 87 vs 80 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 85 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 85 vs 81 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews found online. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

85

Too close to call

Ecsta Sport PS72

Amazon