71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
34 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental CrossContact UHP vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
84 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 75 | 84 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | 91 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact UHP | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 90 |
| Dry | 86 | 94 |
| Wet | 79 | 89 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 72 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 90 |
| Handling | 74 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Cross Contact UHP is a polarizing tire that delivers strong dry and wet road performance but suffers from significant inconsistency regarding tread longevity. While many users praise its handling, stability, and confidence-inspiring grip, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature and uneven wear, particularly on heavier SUVs and 4x4 vehicles.
Pros
- Strong dry and wet road grip
- Predictable handling and cornering stability
- Good performance in light snow and varied weather conditions
- Quiet operation on many vehicle platforms
Cons
- Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- High road noise reported by a significant subset of users
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality
- Poor off-road capability, particularly on wet grass or mud
Observations
- Heavy SUVs and 4x4s frequently exhibit rapid front-axle tire wear, often requiring rotation as early as 8,000-10,000 miles to maintain even tread depth.
- Users with high-center-of-gravity vehicles report that aggressive cornering significantly accelerates rear tire scrubbing.
- Performance varies notably by vehicle weight; lighter or more balanced setups report significantly higher mileage than heavy luxury SUVs.
The Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in comfort, low road noise, and longevity. While it performs reliably on dry and wet pavement, user consensus suggests it is better suited for highway and light-duty use rather than extreme off-road or deep-snow conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point compared to premium competitors.
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort.
- Strong tread life and durability, with many users reporting high mileage.
- Reliable traction on dry and wet road surfaces.
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow and icy conditions.
- Reports of potential vibration or balancing issues on heavier vehicles.
- Not as rugged or aggressive in appearance as dedicated off-road tires.
- Occasional reports of premature cupping or slow air pressure loss.
Observations
- Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported ride quality issues, suggesting the tire may be better suited for lighter SUVs and crossovers.
- Owners of older vehicles and smaller SUVs noted significant improvements in comfort compared to more aggressive, E-load rated tires.
- High-mileage users on vans and highway-focused vehicles consistently report excellent tread longevity, often exceeding 50,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact UHP | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 9 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Continental
90
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 90 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 91 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 89 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 89 vs 79 on wet.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact UHP
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental CrossContact UHP also compared with
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.