Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Solus KH16 vs Michelin CrossClimate SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 99 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 95 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 86 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 94 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 86 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 60 |
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 57 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 71 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH16 | Michelin CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 80 |
| Dry | 76 | 94 |
| Wet | 67 | 90 |
| Snow | 51 | 69 |
| Comfort | 80 | 81 |
| Noise | – | 57 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 72 |
| Handling | 70 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus KH16 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its quiet ride and reliable multi-surface grip, while others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather performance and sidewall stability. While some owners find the tire to be a cost-effective solution for daily driving, others express frustration with inconsistent tread life and handling characteristics.
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions for many users
- Strong value proposition and cost-per-mile efficiency
- Consistent performance across various vehicle types including MPVs and hatchbacks
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
- Significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and safety
- Inconsistent quality control experiences
Observations
- Users operating utility vehicles reported rapid tread wear, though this was contested by manufacturer representatives citing alignment issues.
- Owners of MPVs and hatchbacks generally reported higher satisfaction with the tire's comfort and daily driving performance.
The Michelin CrossClimate SUV is widely regarded as a highly capable all-weather tire that excels in providing confidence-inspiring grip across diverse conditions, including rain, slush, and light snow. While the majority of users praise its quiet operation and ride comfort, a notable minority reports issues with increased road noise over time and a firmer-than-expected ride quality.
Pros
- Exceptional all-weather traction, particularly in wet, cold, and light snow conditions.
- High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise for most users.
- Strong durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported by many owners.
- Significant performance improvement over budget or standard OEM tires.
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise or 'growling' as the tire ages.
- Ride quality can feel overly firm or harsh on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Some users noted a decline in wet-weather performance as the tire reaches the end of its life.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
Observations
- Users with 103 XL load-rated tires reported a harsher, 'droning' ride, suggesting potential incompatibility with specific suspension setups.
- Drivers of larger SUVs (e.g., Audi Q3, Lexus RX) frequently report significant improvements in handling and noise reduction compared to factory-fitted tires.
- Some users noted a slight increase in fuel consumption immediately following installation.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH16 | B · Michelin CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Michelin
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate SUV — better wet, dry and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 90 vs 67 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 94 vs 76 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 69 vs 51 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 75 vs 70 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.