Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Kumho Solus KH16 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Kinergy 4S

All Season High Performance tires

Hankook Kinergy 4S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
13 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
77
Snow
79
Comfort
77
Noise
95
Treadwear
72
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus KH16

Summer Touring tires

Kumho Solus KH16 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
67
Snow
51
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
69
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Solus KH16 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus KH16 leads by 1
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
75
B — Kumho Solus KH16
76
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Professional tests (TWG score) 70 –
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 82 75

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Kinergy 4S leads by 10
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
77
B — Kumho Solus KH16
67
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Professional tests (TWG score) 77 –
Tire Rack owners – 76
Tyre Reviews owners 76 65

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy 4S leads by 28
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
79
B — Kumho Solus KH16
51
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Professional tests (TWG score) 69 –
Tire Rack owners – 51
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus KH16 leads by 3
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
77
B — Kumho Solus KH16
80
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 77 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
95
B — Kumho Solus KH16
–
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Professional tests (TWG score) 95 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Kinergy 4S leads by 3
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
72
B — Kumho Solus KH16
69
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Tire Rack owners – 71
Tyre Reviews owners 72 68

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus KH16 leads by 2
A — Hankook Kinergy 4S
68
B — Kumho Solus KH16
70
Why this score
SourceKinergy 4SSolus KH16
Tyre Reviews owners 68 70

Scores at a glance

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Kumho Solus KH16: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SKumho Solus KH16
Relative Score 75 69
Dry 75 76
Wet 77 67
Snow 79 51
Comfort 77 80
Noise 95 –
Treadwear 72 69
Handling 68 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Kinergy 4S

The Hankook Kinergy 4S is generally regarded as a highly capable all-season tire, particularly praised for its impressive performance in wet, cold, and snowy conditions. While many users report excellent traction and safety in adverse weather, the tire receives mixed feedback regarding its tread longevity and consistency in dry-weather handling.

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable emergency braking performance on slick surfaces

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
  • Increased road noise noted by some users

Observations

  • Users of compact SUVs, such as the Honda CR-V, have reported significantly lower tread life than expected for the vehicle class.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Civic Type R, noted a trade-off in lateral grip and steering feedback when switching from dedicated summer tires.
Tire B Kumho Solus KH16

The Kumho Solus KH16 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its quiet ride and reliable multi-surface grip, while others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather performance and sidewall stability. While some owners find the tire to be a cost-effective solution for daily driving, others express frustration with inconsistent tread life and handling characteristics.

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions for many users
  • Strong value proposition and cost-per-mile efficiency
  • Consistent performance across various vehicle types including MPVs and hatchbacks

Cons

  • Reports of premature or uneven tread wear
  • Soft sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
  • Significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and safety
  • Inconsistent quality control experiences

Observations

  • Users operating utility vehicles reported rapid tread wear, though this was contested by manufacturer representatives citing alignment issues.
  • Owners of MPVs and hatchbacks generally reported higher satisfaction with the tire's comfort and daily driving performance.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Kumho Solus KH16
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Solus KH16 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 79 vs 51 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 77 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 72 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus KH16 scores 80 vs 77 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire B · Kumho Solus KH16

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.